The NYTIMES interviews Jordan Peterson and then wrote a smear piece on him suggesting that this happened to him because of "toxic masculinity."

[EPW]

Let me know when I falsely accuse a mentally ill person of being a toxic drug addict. Until then there isn't a comparison.

Unfortunately for you you don't have that excuse (AFAIK)

[Ming]

Let me know when I falsely believe that I won the presidential election. Until then there isn't a comparison

[Kidlicious]

Neither are wack job YouTube videos...

Let me know when I falsely accuse a mentally ill person of being a toxic drug addict. Until then there isn't a comparison.

[Ming]

Twitter is no place to get an education son.

Neither are wack job YouTube videos...

[Egbert]

I do not understand the fuss about Jordan Peterson. I looked up 0ne of his videos and he seems to be just another random dude with an opinion. I won't be watching, or reading, any more of his material.

[Kidlicious]

I'm not going to watch the video but didn't this happen because he agreed to do some bat**** crazy treatment for opioid addiction that sent him into a comma? I never really saw the appeal of this guy besides the free speech angle.

Twitter is no place to get an education son.

[EPW]

He came down with some sort of mental illness that's pretty bad. I don't know anything about it to tell you the truth, but I know this isn't because of toxic masculinity. This whole thing is very sick and twisted by the NYTIMES.

Here's his daughter's podcast about it.

https://youtu.be/mmk6aESKYWE

I'm not going to watch the video but didn't this happen because he agreed to do some bat**** crazy treatment for opioid addiction that sent him into a comma? I never really saw the appeal of this guy besides the free speech angle.

[Kidlicious]

Wow. Just observing the obvious.

[Literally Wiglaf]

ancouver anucks ation

[Literally Wiglaf]

hair of goaled

some hair is of gold
some hair is
of goal

[Literally Wiglaf]

[-Jrabbit]

Listen, as$hole, I don't give a crap about about any of this. I just followed your link and saw that (surprise, surprise) you either lied deliberately because you hate the NY Times, or you lack the basic reading comprehension to repeat the facts correctly, or you think the NY Times and The Times of London are the same thing.

You're the one who's OK with demonizing someone for things they didn't do, followed by accusing me of something I never said or did.

WRONG AGAIN, KIDIOT!

[Literally Wiglaf]

[Kidlicious]

Look, Kid, if you're going to white-knight this guy, fine, your choice. BUT AT LEAST GET THE NAME OF THE NEWSPAPER RIGHT.

The evil article you're referring to was NOT in the New York Times. It was The Sunday Times (of London), you pearl-clutching culture warrior.

I'll check the box next to "OK with calling mentally ill people toxic" on my list of things you are just fine with.

[Dauphin]

The Sunday Times is owned by Rupert Murdoch.

Just sayin’.