Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is this place still here?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Do you have to give them a special object to make them evolve into the desired form? And do they stay evolved, or is it some temporary bull**** like in Digimon?
    1011 1100
    Pyrebound--a free online serial fantasy novel

    Comment


    • #17
      Yo, welcome back, Elok. I don't know enough about pokemon to respond humorously.

      Originally posted by Lancer View Post
      My understanding is that the act of observation renders our reality, what's your understanding?
      To reply with a little less snark and a little more explanation...

      Quantum mechanics does not define an "observer" in any formal way. However, we are observers, so the results of quantum mechanical experiments that we record are filtered through that undeniable fact. But here's what the theory says:

      Quantum states are linear, which means you can add two or more together to produce a new, viable state. |A> and |B> mix and become |A> + |B>. |A> + |B> is a state and as real as anything else. It "evolves according to the Schrodinger equation," as I said, which just means you can do some math to see what happens to |A> + |B> over time and you will always get the same result, just as if you analyzed the trajectory of a ball accelerated by some force.

      But there are certain observable properties of a quantum system we might want to measure from time to time. We define these observables for ourselves (because they're useful, or familiar, or easy): position, momentum, energy, particle number, etc. Depending on what observable we choose, we might be able to describe the state of the system as |A> + |B>. If so, when we perform the measurement, the device will record the system as being either in state |A> or state B>, rather than the |A> + |B>.

      Those are the known facts. "Nothing is there when you're not looking" is grand and unnecessary speculation beyond what the science has told us. Wave functions evolve according to the Schrodinger equation whether we're looking or not. What we happen to see when we do look is our problem, not reality's.
      Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
      "We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld

      Comment


      • #18
        Elok left?
        Last edited by Dinner; December 26, 2019, 00:14.
        Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

        Comment


        • #19
          Elok always takes a break around holidays.
          Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
          "We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld

          Comment


          • #20
            Maybe he has family things.
            Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

            Comment


            • #21
              I think you are sweeping the 'measurement problem' under the rug, Lori.

              I think that the Copenhagen Interpretation (which you are trying to present) is a perfectly reasonable approach and position to hold, but to say 'that is science' and the other views (including out-there ones like superdeterminism, considered by 't Hooft) are not is not really fair or scientific.

              JM
              Jon Miller-
              I AM.CANADIAN
              GENERATION 35: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.

              Comment


              • #22
                Hmm, not my intention. I was trying to be interpretation-agnostic by not discussing what happens during measurement, only what happens to wave functions and what we end up observing. Maybe there's collapse, maybe there's splitting off into multiple worlds, maybe there's non-local hidden variables, whatever. What we know is what the math says and what experimental results show, and I don't think from that you can conclude that stuff doesn't exist when not observed.

                But this is what you and KH get for leaving the forum. It's left to a guy who took undegrad quantum mechanics and a philosophy of quantum physics course (from this guy) to explain this stuff.
                Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
                "We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld

                Comment


                • #23
                  How often,do you think, does he get addressed as "Bub" in a Warner Brothers / Bowery Boys accent?
                  No, I did not steal that from somebody on Something Awful.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    .
                    Last edited by Ted Striker; August 3, 2020, 22:53.
                    We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution. - Abraham Lincoln

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Lorizael View Post
                      Hmm, not my intention. I was trying to be interpretation-agnostic by not discussing what happens during measurement, only what happens to wave functions and what we end up observing. Maybe there's collapse, maybe there's splitting off into multiple worlds, maybe there's non-local hidden variables, whatever. What we know is what the math says and what experimental results show, and I don't think from that you can conclude that stuff doesn't exist when not observed.

                      But this is what you and KH get for leaving the forum. It's left to a guy who took undegrad quantum mechanics and a philosophy of quantum physics course (from this guy) to explain this stuff.
                      Ahh, yet all those youtube physicists share my understanding. Very wise of them too.
                      Long time member @ Apolyton
                      Civilization player since the dawn of time

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        That you were trying to be interpretation-agnostic explains why I thought you were trying to present the Copenhagen interpretation.

                        I don't think I had any interactions with Bub, Maryland is a big place.

                        JM
                        Jon Miller-
                        I AM.CANADIAN
                        GENERATION 35: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Your repeated use of the word "trying" is telling.
                          Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
                          "We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            I'm not here either. Move along...
                            Speaking of Erith:

                            "It's not twinned with anywhere, but it does have a suicide pact with Dagenham" - Linda Smith

                            Comment


                            • Uncle Sparky
                              Uncle Sparky commented
                              Editing a comment
                              Nice to not see you again! Are you still a Yorkshireman, or have they found a cure?

                            • Provost Harrison
                              Provost Harrison commented
                              Editing a comment
                              A cure for being a member of the master race? How silly ;-)

                            • Dinner
                              Dinner commented
                              Editing a comment
                              Welcome back!

                          • #29
                            Wisdom! Btw I assumed you weren't here when I saw you.
                            Long time member @ Apolyton
                            Civilization player since the dawn of time

                            Comment


                            • #30
                              So many old timers coming back. Fantastic.
                              The Wizard of AAHZ

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X