Do you have to give them a special object to make them evolve into the desired form? And do they stay evolved, or is it some temporary bull**** like in Digimon?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Is this place still here?
Collapse
X
-
-
Yo, welcome back, Elok. I don't know enough about pokemon to respond humorously.
Originally posted by Lancer View PostMy understanding is that the act of observation renders our reality, what's your understanding?
Quantum mechanics does not define an "observer" in any formal way. However, we are observers, so the results of quantum mechanical experiments that we record are filtered through that undeniable fact. But here's what the theory says:
Quantum states are linear, which means you can add two or more together to produce a new, viable state. |A> and |B> mix and become |A> + |B>. |A> + |B> is a state and as real as anything else. It "evolves according to the Schrodinger equation," as I said, which just means you can do some math to see what happens to |A> + |B> over time and you will always get the same result, just as if you analyzed the trajectory of a ball accelerated by some force.
But there are certain observable properties of a quantum system we might want to measure from time to time. We define these observables for ourselves (because they're useful, or familiar, or easy): position, momentum, energy, particle number, etc. Depending on what observable we choose, we might be able to describe the state of the system as |A> + |B>. If so, when we perform the measurement, the device will record the system as being either in state |A> or state B>, rather than the |A> + |B>.
Those are the known facts. "Nothing is there when you're not looking" is grand and unnecessary speculation beyond what the science has told us. Wave functions evolve according to the Schrodinger equation whether we're looking or not. What we happen to see when we do look is our problem, not reality's.Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
"We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Elok always takes a break around holidays.Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
"We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld
- Likes 1
Comment
-
- Likes 1
Comment
-
I think you are sweeping the 'measurement problem' under the rug, Lori.
I think that the Copenhagen Interpretation (which you are trying to present) is a perfectly reasonable approach and position to hold, but to say 'that is science' and the other views (including out-there ones like superdeterminism, considered by 't Hooft) are not is not really fair or scientific.
JMJon Miller-
I AM.CANADIAN
GENERATION 35: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Hmm, not my intention. I was trying to be interpretation-agnostic by not discussing what happens during measurement, only what happens to wave functions and what we end up observing. Maybe there's collapse, maybe there's splitting off into multiple worlds, maybe there's non-local hidden variables, whatever. What we know is what the math says and what experimental results show, and I don't think from that you can conclude that stuff doesn't exist when not observed.
But this is what you and KH get for leaving the forum. It's left to a guy who took undegrad quantum mechanics and a philosophy of quantum physics course (from this guy) to explain this stuff.Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
"We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld
- Likes 1
Comment
-
.Last edited by Ted Striker; August 3, 2020, 22:53.We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution. - Abraham Lincoln
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Lorizael View PostHmm, not my intention. I was trying to be interpretation-agnostic by not discussing what happens during measurement, only what happens to wave functions and what we end up observing. Maybe there's collapse, maybe there's splitting off into multiple worlds, maybe there's non-local hidden variables, whatever. What we know is what the math says and what experimental results show, and I don't think from that you can conclude that stuff doesn't exist when not observed.
But this is what you and KH get for leaving the forum. It's left to a guy who took undegrad quantum mechanics and a philosophy of quantum physics course (from this guy) to explain this stuff.Long time member @ Apolyton
Civilization player since the dawn of time
- Likes 1
Comment
-
That you were trying to be interpretation-agnostic explains why I thought you were trying to present the Copenhagen interpretation.
I don't think I had any interactions with Bub, Maryland is a big place.
JMJon Miller-
I AM.CANADIAN
GENERATION 35: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Your repeated use of the word "trying" is telling.Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
"We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld
- Likes 1
Comment
-
I'm not here either. Move along...Speaking of Erith:
"It's not twinned with anywhere, but it does have a suicide pact with Dagenham" - Linda Smith
- Likes 1
Comment
Comment