Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Trump and the 14th amendment.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    No. We don't know.
    I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
    - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by Kidicious View Post

      Post #49
      Try again... that doesn't support your typical broad sweeping comment that "MOST PEOPLE DO"
      Keep on Civin'
      RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron O

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by Ming View Post

        Try again... that doesn't support your typical broad sweeping comment that "MOST PEOPLE DO"
        Ok. It's commonly part of the process that the courts use to interpret laws. How's that?
        I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
        - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

        Comment


        • -Jrabbit
          -Jrabbit commented
          Editing a comment
          So, no citation. As usual.

      • #64
        Originally posted by Kidicious View Post

        Ok. It's commonly part of the process that the courts use to interpret laws. How's that?
        Not good... Again, you are just making stuff up.
        Your "cite" doesn't even come close to supporting your actual statement.
        TRY AGAIN
        Keep on Civin'
        RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron O

        Comment


        • #65
          Originally posted by Ming View Post

          Not good... Again, you are just making stuff up.
          Your "cite" doesn't even come close to supporting your actual statement.
          TRY AGAIN
          Even if that were true Aeson is against the process that the courts commonly use to interpret laws.
          I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
          - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

          Comment


          • #66
            Originally posted by spambot View Post
            1950s or 60s? Can you give a more exact date?
            He is wrong. It has existed since the Wong case which was in the very, very early 1900s.
            Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

            Comment


            • #67
              Originally posted by Dinner View Post

              He is wrong. It has existed since the Wong case which was in the very, very early 1900s.
              There were no illegal immigrants then. How then could their children get birthright citizenship? Even when we did have illegal immigrants their children were not citizens. Prove me wrong.
              I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
              - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

              Comment


              • #68
                The first immigration laws happened in the 1880's so, yes, there was illegal immigration. That was what the Wong case was all about. Hell, you were even talking about Wong earlier! Why am I not surprised you were babbling away ignorantly?
                Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                Comment


                • #69
                  The executive branch’s birthright citizenship policy is not based on any federal regulation. One might say that the practice has become policy without becoming law.

                  Because the current policy has not been taken through the standard legislative or regulatory processes, it has become official practice without any input from the American public or their elected representatives.
                  I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
                  - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

                  Comment


                  • #70
                    Originally posted by Dinner View Post
                    The first immigration laws happened in the 1880's so, yes, there was illegal immigration. That was what the Wong case was all about. Hell, you were even talking about Wong earlier! Why am I not surprised you were babbling away ignorantly?
                    Wong is before that. Why don't you read?
                    I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
                    - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

                    Comment


                    • #71
                      Originally posted by Kidicious View Post

                      Even if that were true
                      Even...
                      Not even... FACT
                      Your cite had nothing to do with the comment that I asked for a cite on...
                      SO YES, TRY AGAIN and stop just making crap up.

                      Keep on Civin'
                      RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron O

                      Comment


                      • #72
                        Originally posted by Ming View Post
                        Even...
                        Not even... FACT
                        Your cite had nothing to do with the comment that I asked for a cite on...
                        SO YES, TRY AGAIN and stop just making crap up.
                        You did not prove that most people don't believe in the intention of the law.
                        I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
                        - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

                        Comment


                        • #73
                          Originally posted by Dinner View Post
                          The first immigration laws happened in the 1880's so, yes, there was illegal immigration. That was what the Wong case was all about. Hell, you were even talking about Wong earlier! Why am I not surprised you were babbling away ignorantly?
                          Wong was 1898.

                          I can't wait until Mueller gets fired. You so deserve to have your hopes and dreams crushed.
                          I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
                          - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

                          Comment


                          • #74
                            Originally posted by Kidicious View Post

                            You did not prove that most people don't believe in the intention of the law.
                            Actualy the burden of proof is up on you, considering the fact that you are the one that makes an appeal to the masses
                            Tamsin (Lost Girl): "I am the Harbinger of Death. I arrive on winds of blessed air. Air that you no longer deserve."
                            Tamsin (Lost Girl): "He has fallen in battle and I must take him to the Einherjar in Valhalla"

                            Comment


                            • #75
                              Originally posted by Proteus_MST View Post

                              Actualy the burden of proof is up on you, considering the fact that you are the one that makes an appeal to the masses
                              I have to prove that most people believe in the intention of the law?
                              I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
                              - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X