The Altera Centauri collection has been brought up to date by Darsnan. It comprises every decent scenario he's been able to find anywhere on the web, going back over 20 years.
25 themes/skins/styles are now available to members. Check the select drop-down at the bottom-left of each page.
Call To Power 2 Cradle 3+ mod in progress: https://apolyton.net/forum/other-games/call-to-power-2/ctp2-creation/9437883-making-cradle-3-fully-compatible-with-the-apolyton-edition
I am not delusional! Now if you'll excuse me, i'm gonna go dance with the purple wombat who's playing show-tunes in my coffee cup!
Rules are like Egg's. They're fun when thrown out the window!
Difference is irrelevant when dosage is higher than recommended!
It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O
For there is [another] kind of violence, slower but just as deadly, destructive as the shot or the bomb in the night. This is the violence of institutions -- indifference, inaction, and decay. This is the violence that afflicts the poor, that poisons relations between men because their skin has different colors. - Bobby Kennedy (Mindless Menance of Violence)
Dinner sez it's a sandwich. He, obviously, is a person of great refinement and knowledge.
Evolutionarily speaking, it's a descendent of Sandwich Awesomous, on the same taxonomical tree. While a human isn't an ape, we're both primates. Same thing for hot dogs and, for example, a PBJ. Both are sandwiches despite certain, minor, differences.
Next thing we know y'all will deny that an Egg McMuffin isn't a sandwich. Or a croissan'wich from Burger King. Along that path lies madness and set theory confusion.
The important question is whether sandwiches are defined intensionally or extensionally. If the former, then there are necessary and sufficient conditions for ascribing sandwichness to an object. This is where you run into problems. Must have some product between two slices of bread--ah, but what about an open-faced sandwich or whatever? Whenever you try to pin down the essential characteristics sandwichosity, you run into tricky edge cases.
So you define sandwiches extensionally instead. This is the "know it when you see it" definition. The set of all objects identified as sandwiches tells you what a sandwich is. This seems unsatisfying, but it's also often the best you can do. Ideal, Platonic sandwiches don't exist in the real world; the real world is messy. If you want neat and orderly definitions, be a mathematician and take comfort in knowing that mathematics somehow lets you predict what's going to happen in the real world, despite its messiness.
I will grant that a hotdog is "technically" a sandwich. Also, an eggplant is "technically" a fruit. There many things that are "technically" correct, but wrong none the less.
“It is no use trying to 'see through' first principles. If you see through everything, then everything is transparent. But a wholly transparent world is an invisible world. To 'see through' all things is the same as not to see.”
Comment