"Trump was angered by the news that an FBI official working with special counsel Robert Mueller had sent anti-Trump and pro-Hillary Clinton texts to a girlfriend. Mueller removed the married FBI agent from his team."
- The Hill
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Witch Hunt Revealed
Collapse
X
-
I dont know, his emails mocked Trump, they didn't endorse Hillary
-
You think he didn't have a pro-Hillary bias even though he protected her from the law? Did you read the emails?
-
actually I didn't see Strzok's pro-Hillary bias, he mocked Trump
-
There are no facts you moron. It's a political witch hunt and conspiracy theory, unlike Whitewater which was an actual investigation of actual criminal activity.Originally posted by -Jrabbit View PostThe politics of an investigator do not change the facts of the investigation.
See again: Kenneth Starr.
See also: Benghazi.
More to the point the investigation has zero credibility except with left wing dip****s like yourself. In other words NO IMPEACHMENT!
Leave a comment:
-
The politics of an investigator do not change the facts of the investigation.
See again: Kenneth Starr.
See also: Benghazi.
Leave a comment:
-
Fox is reporting that yet another lawyer is extremely bias, and represented the Clinton Foundation. I already knew all the investigators are political hacks. Idk why it is just now reaching MSM.
Leave a comment:
-
This is the case for a special prosecutor to investigate the FBI and DoJ....
Daily CallerIf anyone obstructed justice, it appears to have been Comey’s FBI, not Trump. The relevant statute, 18 U.S.C. Section 1505, makes it a federal crime to “corruptly” obstruct or impede the “due and proper administration of the law” or “any inquiry or investigation…being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress.” It now appears that the due and proper administration of the law was corrupted by Peter Strzok, the FBI agent who argued to his bosses that Clinton lacked the requisite intent to violate the law, all while wanting to see her defeat Trump. (Apparently, Strzok’s pro-Hillary bias was so egregious that even the Special Counsel, who has staffed his team with several prosecutors who donated to Secretary of State Clinton’s campaign, had no option but to immediately sideline the agent once his biases were confirmed in documented communications.)
It is probably a safe bet that Strzok has already lawyered up. If not, he better. After all, if Strzok, who decided not to place Clinton under oathwhen he interviewed her, influenced his bosses’ decision not to charge Clinton (despite her gross mishandling of classified information, destruction of evidence under Congressional subpoena and wiping of her server) without disclosing his personal desire to see her prevail over Trump, a case could be made that he corruptly influenced and impeded his agency’s investigation (and, of course, violated his ethical obligations as a public servant). At any rate, such obstructive conduct would be far worse than any election interference attributed to Russia.
Conversely, if Comey and other supervisors at the DOJ/FBI knew of Strzok’s pro-Hillary biases and stillallowed him to serve as the key agent investigating her and deciding her fate, they arguably obstructed the due administration of justice, which requires that federal officers and agents conduct investigations in a fair and impartial manner.
Either way, if the phrase “justice system” is to retain any meaning, this situation demands the appointment of a special prosecutor immediately — someone with the gravitas of a Rudy Giuliani or Jonathan Turley. With the Department of Justice and FBI stonewalling information requests from Congress, it is sadly becoming clear that once venerable institutions have been politicized and corrupted under the watch of former Attorneys General Eric Holder and Loretta Lynch, and Comey. To get to the bottom of this situation will require a special prosecutor to investigate, at minimum, Strzok’s role in the Clinton probe and the FBI’s handling of several investigations, including the one concerning Clinton’s shady uranium dealings with Russia.
Leave a comment:
-
Here is Newsmax reporting on that article.
As troubling, Mr. Mueller and the Justice Department kept this information from House investigators, despite Intelligence Committee subpoenas that would have exposed those texts. They also refused to answer questions about Mr. Strzok's dismissal and refused to make him available for an interview."
And it said Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein is taking on a questionable role of resisting congressional oversight.
It noted the Justice Department has floated numerous reasons for ignoring the House subpoenas. And it claimed none of them were "persuasive."
"First it claimed cooperation would hurt the Mueller probe, but his prosecutions are proceeding apace," the Journal said. "Then Justice claimed that providing House investigators with classified material could hurt security or sources.
And the Journal said the time has come for Mueller to step down.
"The latest news supports our view that Mr. Mueller is too conflicted to investigate the FBI and should step down in favor of someone more credible," the newspaper said. "The investigation would surely continue, though perhaps with someone who doesn't think his job includes protecting the FBI and Mr. (James) Comey from answering questions about their role in the 2016 election."
Leave a comment:
-
That's the second op-ed that I wanted to read there so I might pay today.
edit: Too much money
Leave a comment:
-
Too bad one cannot read the rest of the opinion piece, as it is behind a paywall
Leave a comment:
-
Our neighboring state / east half, the GDR (DDR), built a wall. Turned out to be a bad idea
-
So apparently there are no nations on the entire planet. Kidiot, spouting his master's voice as usual.
Leave a comment: