A years-long battle over the placement of the Thirty Meter Telescope saw a major development this week, when Hawaii’s Board of Land and Natural Resources issued the telescope a permit to begin construction on the dormant volcano of Mauna Kea, Hawaii. But a coalition of opponents to the telescope, led by Native Hawaiian activists who consider the mountaintop sacred ground, have already vowed to keep fighting.
There are an increasingly limited number of places we can put telescopes that will advance astronomy. You need elevation, dryness, calm winds, clear weather, and no pollution (light or otherwise). Mauna Kea is one of the best locations in the world. It's also sacred ground for Native Hawaiians, who don't particularly like the argument "but what's the harm in one more telescope?" Unlike observatories, there are no backup sacred sites. How do we balance these competing interests?
Comment