I White Knight for Ivanka no more.

[Kidlicious]

First Kid says he doesn't know what it means ... then the next post proves he was lying.

Everyone knows what negging is, mostly because it's so fun to laugh at the MRA/white nationalist/PUA crowd who seriously believe in that kind of ****. You constantly use associated terminology ("cuck", "white knight", and a plethora of misogynistic derogatory terms for women/feminism) and are serious about it.

You aren't fooling anyone. You probably paid money for a PUA course, crashed and burned, which further deepened your bitterness towards women and men who know how to treat them right.

Why are you a white knight but you only want people to call you that in a non-serious way?

[Kidlicious]

No he is not. Despite any of his feeble attempts to claim otherwise.

When did I claim to be fooling people fool?

[rah]

You claim you're not a misogynist while using the language of one. Pretty straight forward. Most here see the same thing as evidenced by their posts.

[Kidlicious]

You claim you're not a misogynist while using the language of one. Pretty straight forward. Most here see the same thing as evidenced by their posts.

Farm animals are smarter than you.

[Kidlicious]

rah: Look everyone! I kill the evil Kidicious monster who calls people what they are!

[Ming]

Farm animals are smarter than you.

The only type of response he can give... pretty typical of Kid.
If you don't agree with him... in his opinion you are stupid.
If you call him on his BS... in his opinion you are stupid.
When you correct his lies and mistaken facts... in his opinion you are stupid.

The good news is, everybody here see's through his BS.
Maybe you should post on some alt-right site where you can all sit around and jerk off...

[ricketyclik]

When did I claim to be fooling people fool?

That's kind of a thing when one's trying to fool people. One doesn't actually claim it.

(Unless you're Donald Trump of course - I love that quote of his from a decade or two ago when he said if he were ever to run for president he'd run as a Repugnicant, because Repugnicant voters are so stupid).

[Kidlicious]

I didn't even call anyone here a cuck lol

[rah]

Yeah, it's quite comical, and predictable whenever he's got nothing. And they're not very creative insults.

[Aeson]

Why are you a white knight but you only want people to call you that in a non-serious way?

I'm not a knight, don't wear white, and don't want to be associated with the context morons like yourself imply with the term.

To you, respect for women is something derogatory which you need a special
term for to deride people with. For me respecting women is just part of being a decent human being.

[ZEE]

I haev learned several tips on how Kidicious PWNs people, from this thrade alone!

[Aeson]

Poor Kid ...

[Kidlicious]

I'm not a knight, don't wear white, and don't want to be associated with the context morons like yourself imply with the term.

To you, respect for women is something derogatory which you need a special
term for to deride people with. For me respecting women is just part of being a decent human being.

You white knight FEMINISTS! I never claimed that you white night women. Do you deny now that you ever said that it's wrong to criticize feminists. Damn, just the other day you said that we shouldn't criticize SJWs.

[Aeson]

I've never said any group is above criticism, my position is there is always room for constructive criticism. No one is perfect.

You're just confused and/or going off on one of your favorite fallacies ... if someone thinks your specific criticism of X is invalid, they must be against all criticism of X. The reality is there are valid criticisms, and invalid... there are constructive methods of criticism and non constructive.

You almost exclusively stick to invalid criticism offered in a non-constructive way. Occasionally you may only hit on one or the other. So most people who aren't morons are going to disagree with your criticism most of the time because you're making a moronic point and/or going about it in a moronic way.

[Kidlicious]

I've never said any group is above criticism, my position is there is always room for constructive criticism. No one is perfect.

You're just confused and/or going off on one of your favorite fallacies ... if someone thinks your specific criticism of X is invalid, they must be against all criticism of X. The reality is there are valid criticisms, and invalid... there are constructive methods of criticism and non constructive.

You almost exclusively stick to invalid criticism offered in a non-constructive way. Occasionally you may only hit on one or the other. So most people who aren't morons are going to disagree with your criticism most of the time because you're making a moronic point and/or going about it in a moronic way.

This is SJWish nonsense. You don't get to decide what I say because you don't think it's constructive. I decide for myself what is constructive. You are worse than a white knight.