Tweet
I like the idea of Democrats, Republicans, and Independents in US Congress being required to wear logos of, say, their top ten corporation donors or bribers.
What does anyone else think about this?
What does anyone else think about this?
-
6Yes - it's another way to create more transparency in government100.00%6No - I liked the idea, but now that MrFun likes it, I think this is a dumb idea0.00%0Banana logos - banana logos everywhere!0.00%0A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican. -
I'd like to know who is being bribed and by whom before they get into Congress or the WH -
Congressperson? What next - personhole cover?
<p style="font-size:1024px">HTML is disabled in signatures
</p>Comment
-
"manager" -> "personager"
"woman" -> "woperson"
"emanation" -> "epersonation"
<p style="font-size:1024px">HTML is disabled in signatures </p>Comment
-
You've never heard of the word, "congressperson," before?Originally posted by loinburger View PostCongressperson? What next - personhole cover? A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.Comment
-
Sounds great ...
it could actually go both ways ...
if a congressperson would do something very popular
(or support a very popular law)
then corporations which are among these Top Ten supporters could use this in their commercials:
"Action X was done with support by Congressperson Y, which is bribed/sponsored by our company"
Tamsin (Lost Girl): "I am the Harbinger of Death. I arrive on winds of blessed air. Air that you no longer deserve."
Tamsin (Lost Girl): "He has fallen in battle and I must take him to the Einherjar in Valhalla"Comment
-
Nobody watches C-SPAN so it wouldn't accomplish anything.Comment
-
"menstruation" -> "womynstruation"Originally posted by loinburger View Post"manager" -> "personager"
"woman" -> "woperson"
"emanation" -> "epersonation" Comment
-
"mandible" -> "personable"<p style="font-size:1024px">HTML is disabled in signatures </p>Comment
-
mnemonic -> peleopmonic<p style="font-size:1024px">HTML is disabled in signatures </p>Comment
-
MrFun -> SirOrMadameFun -> ToWhomItMayConcernFun<p style="font-size:1024px">HTML is disabled in signatures </p>Comment
-
==[ATTACH=CONFIG]178143[/ATTACH]
One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.Comment
-
I think it would be fun if politicians were required to wear NASCAR type jackets. Especially when asked how they voted on bills.It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
RIP Tony Bogey & Baron OComment
-
The basic jackets could be sponsored by the NRA and made by children in Bangladesh.There's nothing wrong with the dream, my friend, the problem lies with the dreamer.Comment
-
Lobbysts could be renamed "sponsors"!Originally posted by rah View PostNo, I did not steal that from somebody on Something Awful.Comment
Comment