Has this website had more awful liberals or more awful conservatives?

[loinburger]

That seems reasonable

[Donegeal]

Sloww's a conservative, yes, but awful? I don't see it. If you want to get Sloww going you rip Texas, not conservatism.

[Imran Siddiqui]

Chegitz mostly earns his spot for defending Stalin and Mao on a few occasions and GePap is there for sometimes being an intellectual **** (he'd sometimes go off-the-wall postmodern, something I associate with awful liberalism), but admittedly their awfulness isn't in the same league as the others'. I'll keep them up there for now with a note that their status is in question

Hell, sometimes I'd go off-the-wall postmodern, though interestingly it was went I was more conservative than I am now. GePap was generally fine - he could get his hackles up in a political thread, but he'd usually keep that stuff out of other unrelated threads. Che was generally ok too - I think we all realized he was defending Stalin and Mao halfheartedly (presumably to keep up his 'cred') rather than he actually believed it - which may be worse to you, I dunno. Though I may be biased because I met Che in person once and he was pretty cool.

[loinburger]

K, with two reasonable votes against they've been removed, but you realize that this is only going to further irritate the awful conservatives (unless that's your intention, in which case I'm okay with that)

[loinburger]

Sloww's a conservative, yes, but awful? I don't see it. If you want to get Sloww going you rip Texas, not conservatism.

Fair enough - when he posts about anything political he's atrocious, but mercifully he doesn't do this very often

[Imran Siddiqui]

you realize that this is only going to further irritate the awful conservatives (unless that's your intention, in which case I'm okay with that)

Oh, I'm aware

[The Mad Monk]

I think C0ckney is an awful liberal because of

rockets rockets rockets

.

[Kidlicious]

Hell, sometimes I'd go off-the-wall postmodern, though interestingly it was went I was more conservative than I am now. GePap was generally fine - he could get his hackles up in a political thread, but he'd usually keep that stuff out of other unrelated threads. Che was generally ok too - I think we all realized he was defending Stalin and Mao halfheartedly (presumably to keep up his 'cred') rather than he actually believed it - which may be worse to you, I dunno. Though I may be biased because I met Che in person once and he was pretty cool.

This explains why you became a leftist. You were a pinko.

[Kidlicious]

K, with two reasonable votes against they've been removed, but you realize that this is only going to further irritate the awful conservatives (unless that's your intention, in which case I'm okay with that)

If you're trying to validate this you're doing an awful job.

[DinoDoc]

Che certainly had his bouts with awfulness.

[Imran Siddiqui]

Oh, we should put DD on the awful conservatives side

(I mean if bouts with awfulness are to be considered sufficient)

[Kidlicious]

If this were valid all commies, anarchists and those who call for violent revolutions against democracies would be on the list by default. This is an epic failure. I'm not surprised however.

[loinburger]

Please add some variety to your posting

[Kidlicious]

Please add some variety to your posting

That's the first time that I've ever attempted to explain what a failure you are.

[loinburger]

You've made approximately ninety-two posts in this thread in which you complain that everybody who is to the left of Hitler isn't listed as an awful liberal. This is sad even by your abysmal standards. It's all well and good that you're whining, I expected that - all I ask is that you have a bit more variety in your whining.