Make anti-LGBT businesses publicly post their policy.

[SlowwHand]

You can't say "hit it or passed it" either.
What a world, what a world.

[MrFun]

Yeah MrFun. Homophobia has been cured just like racism and sexism.

In fact, if you want to help the oppressed, you should be an advocate for white christian heterosexual men. They have it the worst.

my bad

[Kidlicious]

You can't say "hit it or passed it" either.
What a world, what a world.

You can listen to 80s comedy but you can't tell any of the jokes.

[FlameFlash]

The effort it takes to get this type of law passed is better spent fighting discrimination in the first place.

Agreed

This probably violates right to association. And the first amendment gives you the right not to speak.

Probably right... as long as somebody is willing to actually take it to court if it passes.

[MrFun]

Probably right... as long as somebody is willing to actually take it to court if it passes.

No one answered my previous question yet.

How would forcing businesses to post their anti-LGBT policy violate right to association?

Businesses will still be able to continue to choose whether or not to associate with LGBT people.

Besides that, this could actually strengthen the right to association - LGBT people will be able to know beforehand on which businesses they can go to, for services, making a better informed decision as consumers.

[Kidlicious]

No one answered my previous question yet.

How would forcing businesses to post their anti-LGBT policy violate right to association?

Businesses will still be able to continue to choose whether or not to associate with LGBT people.

Besides that, this could actually strengthen the right to association - LGBT people will be able to know beforehand on which businesses they can go to, for services, making a better informed decision as consumers.

If you ask them maybe they will let you put your sign up.

[pchang]

No one seriously thinks Christians are trying to follow the Bible by stoning homosexuals.

Well there is that one candidate in CA.......
http://patch.com/california/ranchosa...s-serious-plan

[MrFun]

No one seriously thinks Christians are trying to follow the Bible by stoning homosexuals.

What are your thoughts then, on those American Christian leaders who influenced Uganda to pass anti-gay laws that makes being gay a crime, punishable by imprisonment or execution??

[Dr Strangelove]

That would make him as boring as Kidicious.

Shhhhh!!!!!!!!! They're the same person!

[Uncle Sparky]

No one seriously thinks Christians are trying to follow the Bible.

Fixed.

[MrFun]

Okay, I take it that my question is being ignored, because there's no answer that can defend the claim that this law would violated the right of association.

[kentonio]

People also have to say what the government tells them to say in some cases. Usually, the purpose is to protect the public or to notify people of a law. This is a lot different than that. This is forcing people to say something that might harm them. Well, MrFun thinks it will harm them.

It's notifying people of a law that allows them to deny service to customers based on a non-voluntary genetic outcome. As for whether it would harm them, they have the freedom to not be harmed by not having such a policy if they chose. Maybe if bigots started taking on some responsibility instead of acting like freedom is some one way street, then they wouldn't be dying out like the pathetic bunch of dinosaurs they are?

Forcing people to say something should only be done for the general welfare, not for someone's personal agenda.

In this case, the general welfare of an extremely large demographic, homosexuals.

Anyone who wants to protect the right of businesses to publicly humiliate gays by making them enter an establishment before being turned away is a **** who should go **** themselves. I just want to be very clear about that.

[Kidlicious]

It's notifying people of a law that allows them to deny service to customers based on a non-voluntary genetic outcome. As for whether it would harm them, they have the freedom to not be harmed by not having such a policy if they chose. Maybe if bigots started taking on some responsibility instead of acting like freedom is some one way street, then they wouldn't be dying out like the pathetic bunch of dinosaurs they are?



In this case, the general welfare of an extremely large demographic, homosexuals.

Anyone who wants to protect the right of businesses to publicly humiliate gays by making them enter an establishment before being turned away is a **** who should go **** themselves. I just want to be very clear about that.

This is quite obviously only motivated by politics. Try being more honest.

[Kidlicious]

Shhhhh!!!!!!!!! They're the same person!

And therefore not boring.

[N35t0r]

This is quite obviously only motivated by politics. Try being more honest.