Originally posted by Fake Boris
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Full Reserve Banking
Collapse
X
-
DISCLAIMER: the author of the above written texts does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for any offence and insult; disrespect, arrogance and related forms of demeaning behaviour; discrimination based on race, gender, age, income class, body mass, living area, political voting-record, football fan-ship and musical preference; insensitivity towards material, emotional or spiritual distress; and attempted emotional or financial black-mailing, skirt-chasing or death-threats perceived by the reader of the said written texts.
-
Originally posted by hitokihitoshi View Postwell i've already shown that L/D < 1, which is contradicts your claim.
Of course your theory assumes that there exists money that is not credit, which is another round of rubbish.In Soviet Russia, Fake borises YOU.
Comment
-
Of course your theory assumes that there exists money that is not credit, which is another round of rubbish. <-- this is not true
I finally got what he's trying to say. Unsurprisingly, I had a hard time understanding because he's plain wrong. <--- this is also not true for at least two distinct reasons
finally, if i we're just focusing on RAH IN ISOLATION, what is the sense in which you mean "average"? what are we averaging over?
Comment
-
You're a complete moron.
My initial claim was about deposit multiplication from an assumption of average balance on Rah's bank account.
Your bogus counterpoint argues with a value of D which is not Rah's average balance, but the balance of all depositors.
finally, if i we're just focusing on RAH IN ISOLATION, what is the sense in which you mean "average"? what are we averaging over?
We're averaging Rah's account balance, working with an hypothesis of 2k.
http://www.investopedia.com/terms/a/average-balance.aspIn Soviet Russia, Fake borises YOU.
Comment
-
i agree with your current interpretation, but i think that it's pretty clear from context that this is not what you had in mind at the time that you made the claim in question. if i'm wrong, then i'd argue that you were being highly misleading toward Rah and the other debaters. moreover, the number of ridiculous things that you've said en route to your current interpretation leaves me pretty skeptical about your grasp of the material. i'm pretty sure that you know way too little on this subject to have such strong opinions. i'd encourage you to get educated and i'd encourage the other debaters to avoid misinterpreting your bluster as a sign that you know what you're talking about.
Comment
-
it's what keeps the site going."The Christian way has not been tried and found wanting, it has been found to be hard and left untried" - GK Chesterton.
"The most obvious predicition about the future is that it will be mostly like the past" - Alain de Botton
Comment
-
Originally posted by hitokihitoshi View Posti'm pretty sure that you know way too little on this subject to have such strong opinions.for good measure, because I don't want to give a n00b the wrong idea.)
Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
"We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld
Comment
-
Originally posted by hitokihitoshi View Posti agree with your current interpretation, but i think that it's pretty clear from context that this is not what you had in mind at the time that you made the claim in question. if i'm wrong, then i'd argue that you were being highly misleading toward Rah and the other debaters. moreover, the number of ridiculous things that you've said en route to your current interpretation leaves me pretty skeptical about your grasp of the material. i'm pretty sure that you know way too little on this subject to have such strong opinions. i'd encourage you to get educated and i'd encourage the other debaters to avoid misinterpreting your bluster as a sign that you know what you're talking about.
I sincerely had a hard time getting your point because your calculations looked like they confirmed my point.
I admit I wrongly used the term "average deposit" rather than "average balance". But that was in the discussion with you, not with Rah. Talking to Rah, I clearly said "if your average balance is 2k, the bank (assuming an economy with just 1 bank of course) earns interest on 15-20k.In Soviet Russia, Fake borises YOU.
Comment
Comment