Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Do you support huge 180x180 avatars?

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 6
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 template Next
  • #16
    Yes.

    Click image for larger version Name: 245554_7467-7467-lovely-bottom-nicole.jpg Views: 1 Size: 37.4 KB ID: 9100801

    Gifted.


    -Incidentally, Sava, please don't do it.
    AC2- the most active SMAC(X) community on the web.
    JKStudio - Masks and other Art

    No pasarán

    Comment

    • #17
      haha
      To us, it is the BEAST.

      Comment

      • #18
        don't do what? resize it?
        To us, it is the BEAST.

        Comment

        • #19
          No I don't.

          ACK!
          Don't try to confuse the issue with half-truths and gorilla dust!

          Comment

          • #20
            haters gonna hate
            To us, it is the BEAST.

            Comment

            • #21
              Originally posted by onodera View Post
              Holy crap, reg's avatar was not playing a harmonica.


              It's from this:

              Comment

              • #22
                Some of you are way too concerned about size...
                There's nothing wrong with the dream, my friend, the problem lies with the dreamer.

                Comment

                • #23
                  It's nice being able to see avatars clearly.

                  80x80 is obsolete... and his been for a decade.
                  To us, it is the BEAST.

                  Comment

                  • #24
                    Remember back when virtually all posting rules were grounded in concepts like file size and server load?
                    Apolyton's Grim Reaper 2008, 2010 & 2011
                    RIP lest we forget... SG (2) and LaFayette -- Civ2 Succession Games Brothers-in-Arms

                    Comment

                    • #25
                      you said "load"
                      To us, it is the BEAST.

                      Comment

                      • #26
                        Originally posted by -Jrabbit View Post
                        Remember back when virtually all posting rules were grounded in concepts like file size and server load?
                        pepridge farm remembers.
                        I wasn't born with enough middle fingers.
                        [Brandon Roderick? You mean Brock's Toadie?][Hanged from Yggdrasil]

                        Comment

                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Sava View Post
                          It's nice being able to see avatars clearly.

                          80x80 is obsolete... and his been for a decade.
                          180x180 is a little distracting.

                          Comment

                          • #28
                            Originally posted by self biased View Post
                            pepridge farm remembers.

                            To us, it is the BEAST.

                            Comment

                            • #29
                              Originally posted by AAAAAAAAH! View Post
                              180x180 is a little distracting.
                              Yes.
                              To us, it is the BEAST.

                              Comment

                              • #30
                                Well, we could double the default text size. That would make the avatars appear to be scaled correctly, and would also provide a significant reading benefit to ancient posters with declining vision (like me).
                                Apolyton's Grim Reaper 2008, 2010 & 2011
                                RIP lest we forget... SG (2) and LaFayette -- Civ2 Succession Games Brothers-in-Arms

                                Comment

                                Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 template Next
                                Working...
                                X