Originally posted by Kidicious
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Fate of Aborted Fetuses
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Ban Kenobi View PostIf their programming makes them far more submissive to authority than humans are, than sure. But being disobedient isn't free will. No matter how many times I tell my coin to land on heads it will only do so half of the time.I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett Kavanaugh
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kidicious View PostDo you hear yourself? You can't program a computer to disobey. If you program it to disobey it will obey.
Comment
-
Originally posted by kentonio View PostYou can program a computer to react based on any number of incredibly complex conditions. It can reach a level of complexity where there really is no difference between how we process ideas. Obey/Disobey really means nothing.I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett Kavanaugh
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ban Kenobi View PostOf course, humans are a lot more likely to cause their own genetic death by other means such as being homosexual than they are to commit suicide.
Comment
-
Probably it's that evolution disproves MrFun. He's pretty clearly a bot planted by conservatives to discredit liberalism.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kidicious View PostMaybe you don't know what you are telling it to do but you are telling it to do something. It understands your command and does it.
If you could map out a humans exact inputs for their entire life (and work out exactly what effect those inputs have), it's perfectly possible that you could predict human behaviour to a frighteningly precise degree.
Comment
-
Neal Stephenson disagrees, mind you, and I imagine he's significantly better-informed on this stuff than you or Kid.
Comment
-
I read it on his Wiki page a while ago--looks like it's since evanesced in editing--but really it's clear from his work. Have you read The Diamond Age, Cryptonomicon, or Anathem? He disparages the idea that we are Turing machines in all three. The general idea is that he thinks human thought is based on some kind of quantum effect, and thus not really predictable or trackable.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Elok View PostThe general idea is that he thinks human thought is based on some kind of quantum effect, and thus not really predictable or trackable.Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
"We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld
Comment
-
Originally posted by Elok View PostI read it on his Wiki page a while ago--looks like it's since evanesced in editing--but really it's clear from his work. Have you read The Diamond Age, Cryptonomicon, or Anathem? He disparages the idea that we are Turing machines in all three. The general idea is that he thinks human thought is based on some kind of quantum effect, and thus not really predictable or trackable.
Comment
-
Wouldn't expect you to. Just trying to shift the conversation away from you hitting Kid over the head repeatedly with the same argument. I guess I should be grateful that this thread hasn't devolved into yet another damn abortion discussion. Anyway, his full reasoning, or something close to it, can be found in Anathem--it's long, mind you, and dense, but it's a fascinating read. I don't really recall the details, but the rationale is that he finds it hard to believe our brains are constantly constructing as detailed a perceptual set as the idea of a "computer" would imply, and his solution is that our consciousness might be a set of superimposed quantum states from all the parallel-world versions of ourselves. Or something. It's been more than a year since I read the book, I think, and I mostly remember all this because of the incredibly trippy ending.
If Anathem is too obtuse or time-consuming for you, at least read The Diamond Age. I've read those two, Crypto, Reamde and Snow Crash, and Diamond Age is definitely my favorite. Full of delightfully goofy Stephensonian digressions and cyber/steampunk whimsy.
Comment
-
Originally posted by kentonio View PostSo why do you think human brains are any different? When things reach a certain level of complexity it becomes nearly impossible to understand exactly what is causing what influence. Gribbler gave the perfect example earlier when he mentioned weather. Weather isn't happening because it has free will, it's just so insanely complex that we can't forecast exactly what weather will occur.
If you could map out a humans exact inputs for their entire life (and work out exactly what effect those inputs have), it's perfectly possible that you could predict human behaviour to a frighteningly precise degree.
As far as inputs, we can choose our inputs and that makes a big difference.I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett Kavanaugh
Comment
-
I recall feeling somewhat skeptical about his argument for quantum voodoo, personally; it seemed to me that you could argue for a perceptual frame that's generated as-needed from memory and the senses. I might have been misunderstanding the argument, too. I suppose my point is that we still don't really understand consciousness, and it's premature to say anything definitive.
Comment
Comment