Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Regulation D

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Regulation D

    www.wellsfuckyouregulationd.com
    Savings Transfer Limits

    We want to make sure you understand an existing federal rule (Regulation D) limiting certain types of transfers from your savings account to a total of six (6) per monthly statement period*. To help you stay within the limit, please keep in mind the following:

    The limit of six (6) transfers per monthly statement period from your savings account includes transfers through the following:
    Online, Mobile, and Text Banking
    Phone transfers - Using Wells Fargo's automated banking service or speaking with a banker on the phone
    Overdraft Protection - Transfers to a checking account for overdraft coverage also counts
    Third-party payments - Includes checks, wires, and ACH transfers (recurring and one-time)
    There are no limits on the number of transfers or withdrawals made in person at ATMs or Wells Fargo banking locations or on any type of deposit.

    If the six (6) transfers per monthly statement period are exceeded, an excess activity fee (currently $15) will be assessed for transactions that exceed the limit. If the limit is exceeded on more than an occasional basis, the savings account must be converted to a checking account (which doesn't have any transaction limits) or closed.

    Beginning December 11, 2013
    If the federal transfer limit of six (6) is reached or exceeded, additional transfers from savings accounts through online banking (including mobile and text) or the telephone may be declined for the remainder of the monthly statement period. We are taking this step to help our customers stay within the federal limit.

    Easy ways to stay within the transfer limit:
    Keep track of your transfers (especially recurring transfers)
    Make transfers in person at an ATM or a Wells Fargo banking location
    I have a few questions:

    a) is the "D" in Regulation D for "Dumb"?

    b) why should a savings account be limited to 6 transactions while a checking account can have a (I don't know exactly how many but it's a hell of a lot more than 6)?

    c) Is there an actual change to Regulation D that prompted this? Like, will banks somehow be held responsible for something that happens at banks now? It seems 6 has been the limit since 2009 ... or is the only change that WellsFargo has just figured out another way to potentially screw their patrons?

  • #2
    It's probably just another step in Obama's plot to drive all expatriates to renounce their citizenships.
    No, I did not steal that from somebody on Something Awful.

    Comment


    • #3
      It's not about consumers. It is about bank regulators and which accounts they will count towards calculating a bank's reserves. It's been on the books since forever.
      “It is no use trying to 'see through' first principles. If you see through everything, then everything is transparent. But a wholly transparent world is an invisible world. To 'see through' all things is the same as not to see.”

      ― C.S. Lewis, The Abolition of Man

      Comment


      • #4

        In the United States under the Securities Act of 1933, any offer to sell securities must either be registered with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or meet certain qualifications to exempt them from such registration. Regulation D (or Reg D) contains the rules providing exemptions from the registration requirements, allowing some companies to offer and sell their securities without having to register the securities with the SEC.[1]
        (or as pchang said) It's basically Wells Fargo screwing you over (they have done similarly to me) for their own purposes.
        “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
        - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

        Comment


        • #5
          wrong reg d, incompetentlawyer
          12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
          Stadtluft Macht Frei
          Killing it is the new killing it
          Ultima Ratio Regum

          Comment


          • #6
            12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
            Stadtluft Macht Frei
            Killing it is the new killing it
            Ultima Ratio Regum

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by The Mad Monk View Post
              It's probably just another step in Obama's plot to drive all expatriates to renounce their citizenships.
              Obama loves us expats ... that's why he let us out of Obamacare so long as we stay out of the country for enough time each year. Clearly he wants everyone young, healthy, and with discretionary income to leave the US as part of an overarching redistribution and cultural integration plan that will result in a world-wide utopia

              It's very devious of him ... this way he can indirectly "raise taxes" by printing and devaluing the currency. The ones outside the US bear the greatest (by percent of income) brunt of this. We generally won't show up to the polls to make him pay for it either!

              :admiration:

              Comment


              • #8
                No, I did not steal that from somebody on Something Awful.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Don't take money advice from people who aren't rich.
                  “It is no use trying to 'see through' first principles. If you see through everything, then everything is transparent. But a wholly transparent world is an invisible world. To 'see through' all things is the same as not to see.”

                  ― C.S. Lewis, The Abolition of Man

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I don't think you're rich enough to tell me that

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      The SEC disagrees
                      “It is no use trying to 'see through' first principles. If you see through everything, then everything is transparent. But a wholly transparent world is an invisible world. To 'see through' all things is the same as not to see.”

                      ― C.S. Lewis, The Abolition of Man

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        is this some sort of gay code?
                        To us, it is the BEAST.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Sava View Post
                          is this some sort of gay code?
                          We're just talking about SEC's positions and how it's not really related to how Wells Fargo is acting like a giant dick ... ****ing me with "regulation D". How could that be gay? :boggle:

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by pchang View Post
                            The SEC disagrees
                            Accredited investor status is the new black.
                            12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
                            Stadtluft Macht Frei
                            Killing it is the new killing it
                            Ultima Ratio Regum

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Well, now that hedge funds can advertise to anyone….
                              “It is no use trying to 'see through' first principles. If you see through everything, then everything is transparent. But a wholly transparent world is an invisible world. To 'see through' all things is the same as not to see.”

                              ― C.S. Lewis, The Abolition of Man

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X