Originally posted by Asher
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Does Anyone Else Find Watching Simpletons Discuss Technology To Be Oddly Reassuring?
Collapse
X
-
"I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton, 2003
-
Originally posted by Asher View Post
Students can use their own devices (iPods, iPhones, Androids, iPads, whatever) to contribute to the lesson on the board in tons of ways - answering interactive questions, contributing to a real-time word cloud or brainstorming session, etc. They can get up to the board and collaborate together to solve a problem (up to 40 touches on displays up to 110"), etc.If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
){ :|:& };:
Comment
-
God forbid a kid just raise his hand and answer a teacher's question. Now we can make him press a button! Teach HIM not to talk out of turn!
Seriously, where was this **** when I was in high school? Everything would have been so much better in math if we'd spent less time doing practice problems and more time doing half-baked activities on ****ty worn-down fragile electronics that we inevitably won't have enough of and so will have to share with two other studentsIf there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
){ :|:& };:
Comment
-
Our method of education is horribly inefficient... putting everyone in a large group and having a single person lecture to them. Everyone learns at a different pace. Lumping everyone together ensures that the group will move at the pace of the slowest person in it.
Schools are designed to be prisons for children. If we want to improve education, we need to make education, not discipline, the goal.To us, it is the BEAST.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View Postagreed. We need to split kids up by skill levels more. They learn faster that way. The slow kids don't become discouraged, and the fast kids aren't slowed down by the slow kids.
I also think it would be beneficial if younger children, especially kids learning at a slower pace, could be somewhat directed in their learning by older and more intelligent children. This could alleviate some of the need for more teachers and lower class sizes.
Smaller groups are easier to manage. Think of it a bit like how TA's help out college professors. The overall lesson plan would be the teacher's responsibility. But the direct management of the smaller groups could be the responsibility of other students.
And during that time, credit would of course be given to those older children... in the form of management training.To us, it is the BEAST.
Comment
-
What worries me is that there are a lot of kids that see other kids who are way smarter than them, and just tell themselves, "Well, I'll never be as good as him, so I won't bother. What's the point?" I think that's a real problem. Maybe they'll never be geniuses but they would still benefit from trying.If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
){ :|:& };:
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View PostOh good. The kids get to have cell phones in class. I'm sure that will prove entirely constructive and not the slightest bit distracting. I bet you even have studies showing that education is improved when kids can text each other under the desks in real time
Comment
Comment