Washington Redskins

[Ogie Oglethorpe]

It's not brilliant to read what was written and repeat it. That's all I did.

In part and innaccurately. Further even with the part actually posted, established a meaning that was never in its clear text or otherwise implied, despite your numerous repostings and wishing that it were.

It's highly entertaining to watch a prideful moron continue to assert he isn't wrong even in the face of overwhelming evidence.

Twice now, Sava speaks truth.

[Sava]

implied

Nothing was implied. You inferred. Don't blame Imran for what your brain does.

[Ogie Oglethorpe]

Nothing was implied. You inferred. Don't blame Imran for what your brain does.

No the correct word is imply. I am the author of the contended passage. Thus any implicit meaning would be my implication. Contended passage is namely:

Imran you do so well at selectively editing post 87 to make it look as if the entirety of your posts had nothing to do with whether a team could be required to legally change their name or whether their trademarked property (i.e in this case if taken to its logical conclusion as you argue in further posts potentially "the Chop") could be forcibly and legally challenged.

I did not explicitly state nor imply the meaning you have given to the passage. You were the reader and got it wrong. You inferred a meaning I never stated nor implied. In particular your read was that I had somehow stated Imran weighed in at some point to state that Redskins could be forced to change their name.

Per:

Imran didn't say the Redskins would be legally required to change their name. In fact, he said the opposite.

This obviously was not my meaning nor the purpose of the post. The purpose of the post was to address Imran's initial question regarding who brought up legal arguements in the first place. Which for the record is still Imran.

http://blog.oxforddictionaries.com/2011/10/imply-or-infer/

[Sava]

You never specified who implied what.

The only one here who has made a serious reading comprehension issue is you.

[DinoDoc]

This conversation is boring and you people should feel bad about yourselves for continuing it this long.

[Sava]

Should I call him a pussytwat?

[Captain ******* Kirk]

And everyone would be much happier

I'm sure the people on the rez will be ecstatic once they're completely forgotten.

[Dinner]

I see we have posters who are trying to keep the legend of DFG alive.

[Sava]

I'm sure the Israeli delegation would love this one:

[The Mad Monk]

[The Mad Monk]

[Sava]

So you are saying that if I walked down the street dressed up doing stereotypical Viking behavior... that this is the same thing as doing a racial stereotype.

This is your position.

Correct?

[Sava]

A more apt example for the Jewish one would be "New York ****s".

Also, is "Irish" a derogatory term to describe Irish people?

Do Scandinavians get offended if you call them Vikings? Is Viking a slur?

[The Mad Monk]

Because "Indians" is now equivalent to "****s"?

Check yourself before you wreck yourself.

[Sava]

/points to thread title

How am I supposed to pwn you if you self-pwn before getting off your short bus?