Rolf Harris arrested in Jimmy Savile case

[Alexander's Horse]

The unnamed 82 year old entertainer from Berkshire? It's Rolf.

http://kangaroocourtofaustralia.com/2013/03/30/rolf-harris-arrested-in-uk-sex-scandal-police-investigation/

http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2012/11/rolf-harris-questioned-in-connection-to-savile-case-2505056.html

Funny how I immediately thought of Rolf, always seemed to be something wrong with him

[Dauphin]

"Can you see what it eez yet?"

[OneFootInTheGrave]

Wow... he never struck me as a paedo... I am suprised he did not figure they will be after him and he simply moved out somewhere else for retirement.

[Alexander's Horse]

"Can you see what it eez yet?"

Now we know that the extra leg was

[Bugs ****ing Bunny]

Good to see that old "innocent until proven guilty" nonsense has been sensibly ditched.

[C0ckney]

Good to see that old "innocent until proven guilty" nonsense has been sensibly ditched.

i was just thinking the same thing.

[Bugs ****ing Bunny]

Bumped over the 2005 threads.

[Ogie Oglethorpe]

Good to see that old "innocent until proven guilty" nonsense has been sensibly ditched.

Welcome to Joe Paterno's last moments of life.

[DinoDoc]

Welcome to Joe Paterno's last moments of life.

That's not what investigators found though.

[Bugs ****ing Bunny]

Welcome to Joe Paterno's last moments of life.

He was the best thing in Death Race 2000.

[Ogie Oglethorpe]

That's not what investigators found though.

By that you I assume you mean the "unbiased" Freeh report.


http://www.powerlineblog.com/?s=joe+paterno
King Spalding 3rd Party Critique of Freeh report find as follows (Per Richard Thornburgh):

Former Attorney General Thornburgh is an expert in conducting effective fact
investigations. He has reviewed the Freeh report and concluded that its investigative
methodology is flawed, that its factual findings are limited and incomplete, and that its
observations as to Joe Paterno are unreliable and unfounded. In the former Attorney
General’s own words, he concluded:
 “The lack of factual support for the SIC’s inaccurate and unfounded findings
related to Mr. Paterno and its numerous process-oriented deficiencies was a rush
to injustice and calls into question the credibility of the entire Report.”2
 “In my opinion, the Freeh Report is seriously flawed, both with respect to the
process of the SIC’s investigation and its findings related to Mr. Paterno.”3
 “When considered in the context of investigation ‘best practices,’ it is evident that
the Freeh Report and many of its findings as they relate to Mr. Paterno are not
accurate, thorough, fair or credible. . . . The process of the SIC’s investigation
was deficient in numerous ways, including the failure to interview virtually all of
the key witnesses and the reliance upon limited, ambiguous documents.”4
 “Perhaps most significantly, the findings in the Freeh Report about Mr. Paterno
concerning his alleged knowledge of the 1998 incident and purported
concealment of the 2001 incident were not properly supported.”5
 “This lack of evidence supporting the Report’s most scathing findings and the
serious flaws with respect to the process of the SIC’s investigation cause me to
conclude that the Report’s findings concerning Mr. Paterno are unjust and
wrong.”6

[DinoDoc]

By that you I assume you mean the "unbiased" Freeh report.

Mainly yes. Also to the testimony by Mike McQueary.

[Alexander's Horse]

Rolf is being protected, case may not be that strong

[Bugs ****ing Bunny]

Every single mainstream TV personality from the 1970s appears to be the subject of accusations right now. It smacks of a witch-hunt.

How the hell would you reconstruct an alibi for an accusation relating to 40 years ago?

[Jon Miller]

Is that the Catholic argument too?

JM