A Dying Veteran's Letter to Bush and Cheney

[Kidlicious]

how would I know if he is being truthful? How would you? His statement is his statement.

Because it's HIS fault that this happened to him, as I said. Yet he puts the blame on others, and not enough, or any, on himself. It's obvious.

The truth is that you disagree with his conclusions so you attempt to vilify him, isn't it?

This has nothing, zero, to do with his conclusions. This is about using a disability, to make people feel sorry for you, because you are resentful of others.

I disagree with his conclusions as well, but respect his right to have them and publish them however he chooses.

Do you have to be told 100 times. Just because something is published, doesn't make it good. Do you call KKK propaganda good?

[Tuberski]

Kid, do you know anything about the man? Other than what MrFun posted?

He's not pissed that he's injured and going to die, he pissed about where it happened, he would have had some peace if it had happened in Afghanistan.

You call him passive-agreesive, duh, he's in a wheelchair.

MrFun, do you know why he's dying?

He's dying because he wants to die, he went into hospice care by choice, he can't live like he is.

The documentary "Body of War" is his story.

http://www.bodyofwar.com/

ACK!

[MrFun]

I plan to check out that documentary, Tuber.

[Kidlicious]

He's not pissed that he's injured and going to die, he pissed about where it happened, he would have had some peace if it had happened in Afghanistan.

I don't think that matters. I happen to think invading Iraq was the right thing to do. I've changed my mind a couple times on the issue. It's not that I really think it's horrible that he's passive aggressive because he's in a wheelchair, just that others use him as a spokesman, and they are not in a wheelchair.

[Kidlicious]

I think Death said it best, "... not one of you has any balls."

[Tuberski]

I don't think that matters. I happen to think invading Iraq was the right thing to do. I've changed my mind a couple times on the issue. It's not that I really think it's horrible that he's passive aggressive because he's in a wheelchair, just that others use him as a spokesman, and they are not in a wheelchair.

Unfortunately, He's the only one that knows. Why do you think invading Iraq was the right thing to do? None of the reasons for it that they used, were anywhere close to accurate.

Of course they use him, he lets them. Are you saying if BK spoke up on the rights of deaf people, then he is being used unfairly by deaf rights activists?

Watch the movie I mentioned, he doesn't go into it blindly.

ACK!

[Berzerker]

soldiers should be able to pick their wars and 'god'-given rights are based on valid claims of moral superiority

[Kidlicious]

Unfortunately, He's the only one that knows. Why do you think invading Iraq was the right thing to do? None of the reasons for it that they used, were anywhere close to accurate.

I think it was the right thing to do because Saddam was our enemy and the world is a better place without him. A better world doesn't seem to be good enough for some folks.

Of course they use him, he lets them. Are you saying if BK spoke up on the rights of deaf people, then he is being used unfairly by deaf rights activists?

It doesn't matter if he let's them. I'm not concerned about him being exploited. I just think it's the wrong way to make an argument.

Watch the movie I mentioned, he doesn't go into it blindly.

ACK!

I'll pass but take your word for it.

[MichaeltheGreat]

Off from your shift sleeping drunk in the WalMart parking lot in the AMC Gremlin you live in?

**** Saddam. He wasn't an "enemy" he was a two-bit third world goat ****er buffoon. Not worth one American life, let alone thousands.

[Kidlicious]

Off from your shift sleeping drunk in the WalMart parking lot in the AMC Gremlin you live in?

Temper, temper.

**** Saddam. He wasn't an "enemy" he was a two-bit third world goat ****er buffoon. Not worth one American life, let alone thousands.

That's right, and the world is a bright and wonderful place with despots who gas their polulation and take over their smaller nieghbors.

[MichaeltheGreat]

I was giving you a promotion. I figure normally you sleep in the gutter.

Awww, he gassed his own people. Cry me a ****ing river. He didn't take over his neghbor for long, and they sort of asked for it, by overdrilling in a common field (don't know if you knew this, but oil in the ground doesn't know which side of a border its on) during the Iran-Iraq war. Besides, under the good Bush, we emasculated Saddam. He was reduced to gassing his own people, because he couldn't take on anything. Mission Accomplished. Back in '91.

[Kidlicious]

I'm not arguing with a Saddam apologist.

[MrFun]

It doesn't matter if he let's them. I'm not concerned about him being exploited. I just think it's the wrong way to make an argument.

So it's wrong for civil rights advocates to refer to Martin Luther King Jr's words and works in building up their own arguments?

[Kidlicious]

So it's wrong for civil rights advocates to refer to Martin Luther King Jr's words and works in building up their own arguments?

Martin Luther King Jr was non-violent. Nice try though.

[MrFun]

Keep moving your goal posts. It's good for some chuckles.