Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Do you support subsidized prostitution for the disabled?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Do you support subsidized prostitution for the disabled?

    Recent reports that a care home procured sex workers for its disabled residents and new film The Sessions have put disability and sex in the spotlight. But is the focus on prostitution helpful?


    TLDR summary: it's an article about the sex lives of handicapped people in the UK. The relevant bit goes:

    King found his sexual surrogate online, through the TLC Trust, a UK organisation that seeks to connect people with disabilities to sex workers. According to its founder, sex therapist Tuppy Owens, each of the 100 sex workers listed on the website could be seeing around eight disabled clients a month. "Finding a sex worker who will talk, teach, accept … is a bit of a boost of confidence and self-esteem," she says.

    Becky Adams, who describes herself as a former madam, runs a not-for-profit, telephone-based service supported by TLC, and says she receives about 12 inquiries a week from disabled and vulnerable people looking for a trusted sex worker. She plans to open the first brothel designed for disabled clients in the UK next year. She says she wants to provide an environment in which people with disabilities can explore their sexuality. "That can be sex," she says, "but also having a cuddle. It could even be someone having an hour cross-dressing who wouldn't normally have the privacy to. I've been overwhelmed by the response we've had."

    One of her clients, Chris Fulton, 29, who has cerebral palsy and muscular dystrophy, has launched a campaign calling on the government to introduce a Netherlands-style grant scheme in which citizens with disabilities receive public money to pay for sexual services up to 12 times a year.
    So: would you support or oppose a government-sponsored "good feels on wheels" program?
    16
    Yes, because I think it's only fair
    18.75%
    3
    Yes, but only because I have some weird fetish
    6.25%
    1
    No, my precious tax dollars should only be spent on smutty art projects
    18.75%
    3
    No, the disabled should pay for their own booty
    25.00%
    4
    It would be better to just move them to the Netherlands where they can get pot AND whores
    18.75%
    3
    I just don't know anymore
    0.00%
    0
    ...sigh...banana
    12.50%
    2
    1011 1100
    Pyrebound--a free online serial fantasy novel

  • #2
    "My nation is the world, and my religion is to do good." --Thomas Paine
    "The subject of onanism is inexhaustable." --Sigmund Freud

    Comment


    • #3
      Actually, this sounds like it could open a mind-boggling can of worms, legally speaking. If a dude has to pay a hooker extra to indulge his fetish, will he receive full reimbursement or pay OOP for kinky extras? Would the latter count as discrimination against quadriplegics with a taste for watersports? Would participating hookers get tax credits or benefits of some kind? How do threesomes factor in? Can a participant spend the dough on porn instead? Are they allowed to specify "freaky black chicks," then apply for extra funds when the chick is neither as black nor as freaky as promised? Etc...
      1011 1100
      Pyrebound--a free online serial fantasy novel

      Comment


      • #4
        Disabled people should just masturbate to smutty art projects subsidized by the government
        <p style="font-size:1024px">HTML is disabled in signatures </p>

        Comment


        • #5
          That discriminates against disabled people who can't masturbate, I think.
          1011 1100
          Pyrebound--a free online serial fantasy novel

          Comment


          • #6
            True, but if the government subsidizes handjobs / fingerbanging for disabled people who don't have hands then this would be a lot cheaper and easier to regulate than if the government subsidizes prostitution for all disabled people.

            The policy would still discriminate against disabled people who don't have genitals, but they're SOL either way.
            <p style="font-size:1024px">HTML is disabled in signatures </p>

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Elok View Post
              So: would you support or oppose a government-sponsored "good feels on wheels" program?
              I'd say this falls under the '**** it, why not?' category. If it makes some people more happy without making anyone involved unhappy, then it sounds like a win-win. it's not like the money involved is going to be significant.

              Comment


              • #8
                Are you serious?! You're actually willing to advocate socialized prostitution as long as the cost is kept under control?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Government gives them some money to live on.

                  They can choose to spend some of it on whores.

                  If people choose to be whores, then obviously it is commendable to whores to disabled people too....

                  JM
                  Jon Miller-
                  I AM.CANADIAN
                  GENERATION 35: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Seriously, from the sound of that article (which matches the way I think the world works) what people want/need is a good relationship (cuddle time?)/etc. You don't get that from a whore.

                    I would be better inclined to pay for a 'disabled persons match.com' or something like that.

                    JM
                    Jon Miller-
                    I AM.CANADIAN
                    GENERATION 35: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Jon Miller View Post
                      Seriously, from the sound of that article (which matches the way I think the world works) what people want/need is a good relationship (cuddle time?)/etc. You don't get that from a whore.
                      Oh I don't know, Diary of a Call Girl (not exactly academic research I realize) seemed to paint a different picture.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Hookers DON'T all have hearts of gold?!?! Tell me it isn't so. I have a basement full of them - I've been saving their hearts for a rainy day.
                        There's nothing wrong with the dream, my friend, the problem lies with the dreamer.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          LMAO
                          When all else fails, blame brown people. | Hire a teen, while they still know it all. | Trump-Palin 2016. "You're fired." "I quit."

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Uncle Sparky View Post
                            Hookers DON'T all have hearts of gold?!?! Tell me it isn't so. I have a basement full of them - I've been saving their hearts for a rainy day.
                            Nah, they mostly just use iron pyrites these days; it's like getting a boob job, but for sappy emotional types.
                            1011 1100
                            Pyrebound--a free online serial fantasy novel

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Socrates: "Good is That at which all things aim, If one knows what the good is, one will always do what is good." Brian: "Romanes eunt domus"
                              GW 2013: "and juistin bieber is gay with me and we have 10 kids we live in u.s.a in the white house with obama"

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X