Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Are monogamous animals more moral than non-monogamous animals?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Are monogamous animals more moral than non-monogamous animals?

    Wait for the poll
    8
    Yes
    25.00%
    2
    No
    50.00%
    4
    Maybe
    25.00%
    2
    <p style="font-size:1024px">HTML is disabled in signatures </p>

  • #2
    It depends on how tasty they are and how pesky they are. Monogamous skunks are more moral because they presumably reproduce less. Non-monogamous pigs are more moral because pig tastes awesome.
    If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
    ){ :|:& };:

    Comment


    • #3
      Only animals capable of understanding morality can be moral or immoral.
      No, I did not steal that from somebody on Something Awful.

      Comment


      • #4
        I don't know ... but I do know that monogrammed animals are very immoral. There are squirrels monogrammed onto this towel we have an they end up touching people's naughty parts without even asking first!

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by The Mad Monk View Post
          Only animals capable of understanding morality can be moral or immoral.
          Excellent point. Likely too deep in thought for the thread starter.
          Life is not measured by the number of breaths you take, but by the moments that take your breath away.
          "Hating America is something best left to Mobius. He is an expert Yank hater.
          He also hates Texans and Australians, he does diversify." ~ Braindead

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by The Mad Monk View Post
            Only animals capable of understanding morality can be moral or immoral.
            Which is why Republicans should not be judged the same way Democrats are judged.
            There's nothing wrong with the dream, my friend, the problem lies with the dreamer.

            Comment


            • #7
              Since God is a Christian God and creator of all life and that marriage is the union between only a man and a woman, monogamous animals must therefore be more moral than non-monogamous animals.
              “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
              "Capitalism ho!"

              Comment


              • #8
                If marriage is between a man and a woman, then no animals can ever be married, and therefore they should instead follow "Be fruitful and multiply'.
                <Reverend> IRC is just multiplayer notepad.
                I like your SNOOPY POSTER! - While you Wait quote.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by The Mad Monk View Post
                  Only animals capable of understanding morality can be moral or immoral.
                  That rules out most humans.
                  Jon Miller: MikeH speaks the truth
                  Jon Miller: MikeH is a shockingly revolting dolt and a masturbatory urine-reeking sideshow freak whose word is as valuable as an aging cow paddy.
                  We've got both kinds

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by snoopy369 View Post
                    If marriage is between a man and a woman, then no animals can ever be married, and therefore they should instead follow "Be fruitful and multiply'.
                    And the gay animals can "Be fruity and multiply (by 1)"

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      No, it's two separate things. Be fruitful, and multiply. That covers both directions, really. God ordered them/us to be bisexual.
                      <Reverend> IRC is just multiplayer notepad.
                      I like your SNOOPY POSTER! - While you Wait quote.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by The Mad Monk View Post
                        Only animals capable of understanding morality can be moral or immoral.
                        This.
                        Do not fear, for I am with you; Do not anxiously look about you, for I am your God.-Isaiah 41:10
                        I praise you because I am fearfully and wonderfully made - Psalms 139.14a
                        Also active on WePlayCiv.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          This poll needs a scale 1 - most immoral, 10 - most moral. Where on the morality scale would monogamous animals sit and where would Britney sit?
                          Socrates: "Good is That at which all things aim, If one knows what the good is, one will always do what is good." Brian: "Romanes eunt domus"
                          GW 2013: "and juistin bieber is gay with me and we have 10 kids we live in u.s.a in the white house with obama"

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            For those of you still not convinced, imagine that the animals in question are fish.
                            “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
                            "Capitalism ho!"

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I imagined snails... but as they say a picture is worth a lot more than an oneliner

                              Socrates: "Good is That at which all things aim, If one knows what the good is, one will always do what is good." Brian: "Romanes eunt domus"
                              GW 2013: "and juistin bieber is gay with me and we have 10 kids we live in u.s.a in the white house with obama"

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X