Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

I am now in favor of continuous tax cuts.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • I am now in favor of continuous tax cuts.

    I'm taking a bit of flak in comments to my silly Bob Dylan post from Sunday, with various right-wingers spontaneously popping in to tell me that JFK cut taxes. My initial reaction to this is to think that supposing a perfect equivalence between JFK cutting the top rate from 90% to 70% during a time of relative peace and prosperity and our current economic scenario is yet another demonstration of the fine grasp of historical and mathematical reasoning that makes the Tea Party crowd such a treat.


    See, if it’s the act of cutting taxes that matters, not the start and end points, then clearly, you don’t want to move from the current economic hellscape of a 35% top rate (according to Wikipedia, anyway) to whatever the optimum tax rate would be– not zero, because if we had zero taxes, we wouldn’t have the money to fund futile foreign wars, and we couldn’t have that, but some very small rate that we’ll call ε– in a single step. Clearly, you would be better off splitting that cut into two smaller cuts, each of:

    K=(R-ε)/2

    (where K is the amount you reduce the tax rate and R is the current rate). Cut taxes once this year, and reap the benefits of magic economic growth, and again next year, and you’ll get twice the growth. It’s a win-win.

    But it gets better…


    If two cuts are good, then three would be even better. Cut the rate by

    K=(R-ε)/3

    for each of the next three years, and you get three years of economic growth. And, of course, being savvy math-capable types, you can immediately see where this is going. If each tax cut gives you economic growth, than you can guarantee N years of increased growth by cutting the rate by:

    K=(R-ε)/N

    each year for the next N years.

    Like a good physicist, of course, I immediately recognize that that N in the denominator gives us the opportunity to take the limit as N goes to infinity, effectively turning the sum of cuts into an integral. In which case, we can generate infinite economic growth. The tax rate will asymptotically approach ε, but the economy will increase without limit. Soon, we’ll control the economic resources of the entire Virgo cluster, and we’ll be able to build particle accelerators to probe the Planck scale using change found in the couch.


    (Yes, I realize I'm posting a two-year old blog post.)
    Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
    "We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld

  • #2
    Here is a pity post. Also a cookie.
    1011 1100
    Pyrebound--a free online serial fantasy novel

    Comment


    • #3
      Can't we raise taxes once, then cut taxes twice to get back to the previous rate?

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Elok View Post
        Here is a pity post. Also a cookie.
        You're very kind.

        Originally posted by gribbler View Post
        Can't we raise taxes once, then cut taxes twice to get back to the previous rate?
        A commenter on the blog made a similar suggestion.
        Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
        "We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld

        Comment


        • #5
          science
          To us, it is the BEAST.

          Comment


          • #6
            From the lack of response, I am forced to conclude that this amusing thought experiment has destroyed the argument that lowering taxes = good.
            Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
            "We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld

            Comment


            • #7
              Well, obviously.
              "My nation is the world, and my religion is to do good." --Thomas Paine
              "The subject of onanism is inexhaustable." --Sigmund Freud

              Comment

              Working...
              X