Originally posted by Hauldren Collider
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Mitt Romney Would Pay 0.82 Percent in Taxes Under Paul Ryan's Plan
Collapse
X
-
Yes. I was countering reg's claim that people with a safety net don't take risks because they don't need to. We see rich people (businessmen such as Romney) taking risks all the time, despite the fact that they could just sit back and be rich.Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
"We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld
-
Ever hear of the dot.com bust youngling?Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View PostYou want data? Take a quick count of all the silicon valley startups that are valued in the millions that didn't exist just five years ago. Every one of those is an example of someone starting with very little and ending out with a lot, requiring nothing but ingenuity.I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett Kavanaugh
Comment
-
It all comes out to how much total tax you pay. For those who believe in a progressive income tax there is no problem with taxing investment income as it just increases the total tax of those with high incomes. It really doesn't matter how you increase the tax for those with high incomes.Originally posted by Jaguar View PostWage taxes reduce investment income by themselves, by reducing the principal. The correct tax rate on investment income is 0. Paul Ryan wants to treat investment and non-investment equally, just like you. The difference between him and you is that he understands math.I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett Kavanaugh
Comment
-
I'm really amused that the people who are most infuriated with the current deficit are the people who care the least about how little tax people who can afford to pay tax actually pay."The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "
Comment
-
EVERYONE should pay more. Every ****ing one. Some people significantly more than others, but everyone is undertaxed in this country.Originally posted by Asher View PostI'm really amused that the people who are most infuriated with the current deficit are the people who care the least about how little tax people who can afford to pay tax actually pay."My nation is the world, and my religion is to do good." --Thomas Paine
"The subject of onanism is inexhaustable." --Sigmund Freud
Comment
-
Originally posted by Guynemer View PostWhy not do both, because just doing one or the other isn't going the fix the deficit.
"The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "
Comment
-
There's far more to life, liberty, and happiness than GDP.Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View PostGuynemer thinks opposition to taxes is nothing but stinginess, and doesn't seem to recognize that taxes dampen economic growth.
Last I checked, the US' economic growth outpaced Canada's...except our government isn't ridiculously in debt, doesn't carry obscene deficits, and Canadians are healthier and happier."The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View PostGuynemer thinks opposition to taxes is nothing but stinginess, and not the fact that taxes dampen economic growth.
Any other amazing insights into my psyche, Kreskin?"My nation is the world, and my religion is to do good." --Thomas Paine
"The subject of onanism is inexhaustable." --Sigmund Freud
Comment
-
Even a die hard liberal must admit that government will inevitably grow if left to its own devices, as people in any given department will always want more money for whatever their branch does - it's not even wrong of them, really; it's their job to advocate for their cause. Occasionally you must reduce the programs that exist, because creep must occur, and their will be too much spending on some programs.
Honestly, the simplest solution might be to have a twenty year limit on ANY spending, and require a full reconsideration of all budget items from scratch every twenty years or so. But that would require actual work on the part of our congressmen and women =/<Reverend> IRC is just multiplayer notepad.
I like your SNOOPY POSTER! - While you Wait quote.
Comment
-
This is something you've said yourself in the past. I'm not doing a mind-reading here. If I am misremembering or mischaracterizing, I apologize.Originally posted by Guynemer View Post
Any other amazing insights into my psyche, Kreskin?If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
){ :|:& };:
Comment
-
I doubt it would work. We've seen what happens when Congress sets deadlines for itself. It finds a way around them.Originally posted by snoopy369 View PostHonestly, the simplest solution might be to have a twenty year limit on ANY spending, and require a full reconsideration of all budget items from scratch every twenty years or so. But that would require actual work on the part of our congressmen and women =/If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
){ :|:& };:
Comment
Comment