Texas GOP rejects ‘critical thinking’ skills. Really.

[Wiglaf]

What "special status" is being granted to the Gays that the GOP is so worried about? Uh, marriage

Correct.

Which is so vaguely worded that for all we know it's tacit support for giving a pass to assault and battery so long as the victim is a queer.

Okay. Remind me again, its the Republicans who are disingenuous and "lying through their teeth," right?

so why doesn't it use those specific words?

Because they wanted to also condemn pornography generally, but not criminalize it.

[Wiglaf]

Well, they want to be allowed to continue to discrimnate against the gays

This is correct, in the same sense that they also want to discriminate against those who practice incest or bestiality and seek to marry their children or pets. You seem to think the discrimination is wrong when it comes to gays (for some reason), but even if it is morally wrong and bad policy, it could hardly be said it is an act of "big intrusive government." It is a decision by the government to stay out of something it has always stayed out of, a concept that until recently was unheard of: gay marriage.

[Tuberski]

Which is so vaguely worded that for all we know it's tacit support for giving a pass to assault and battery so long as the victim is a queer.

Only if you beat them up religiously.

ACK!

[Tuberski]

This is correct, in the same sense that they also want to discriminate against those who practice incest or bestiality and seek to marry their children or pets. You seem to think the discrimination is wrong when it comes to gays (for some reason), but even if it is morally wrong and bad policy, it could hardly be said it is an act of "big intrusive government." It is a decision by the government to stay out of something it has always stayed out of, a concept that until recently was unheard of: gay marriage.

I don't see any mention of incest, bestiality or marrying their children on their platform.

ACK!

[Wiglaf]

Give progressives another 50 years or so and it will become necessary to include.

YOURE A DOUCHE!

[Dinner]

which at least is not plagiarized like the OP

It's a quote of the beginning of the actual ****ing Washington Post article along with a link to the article. Calling that "plagiarized" is a new low for you.

[The Mad Monk]

Man, you just enjoy willfully ignoring the most obvious stuff, huh?



And by the way, the Texas GOP is so stupid that they think that RU 486 and the MAP are two different things.

RU 486 is mifepristone; the MAP is either levonorgestrol or ulipristal acetate. They work by different pathways, and have different overall effects.

I guess that makes you so stupid that you think that RU 486 and the MAP are not two different things.

[Elok]

RU 486 is mifepristone; the MAP is either levonorgestrol or ulipristal acetate. They work by different pathways, and have different overall effects.

I guess that makes you so stupid that you think that RU 486 and the MAP are not two different things.

I'm actually almost surprised that the GOP of any state was willing to distinguish between drug-induced abortions and emergency contraceptives which are alleged to prevent implantation (I've heard that the MAP won't actually do that).

[Lonestar]

RU 486 is mifepristone; the MAP is either levonorgestrol or ulipristal acetate. They work by different pathways, and have different overall effects.

I guess that makes you so stupid that you think that RU 486 and the MAP are not two different things.

Did you know that if you wiki "Morning after pill" it takes you straight to the RU 486 entry in the "emergency contraceptives" article?

[Wiglaf]

It's a quote of the beginning of the actual ****ing Washington Post article along with a link to the article. Calling that "plagiarized" is a new low for you.

Use quote tags then, douche.

[Dinner]

No.

[Wiglaf]

TYT is like Hannity for California *** hipster liberals. How do you live with yourself being such a caricature of a douche? You DOUCHE.

[Dinner]

You call someone else a caricature? Based on nonsense? Now I've seen everything.

[Ogie Oglethorpe]

Did you know that if you wiki "Morning after pill" it takes you straight to the RU 486 entry in the "emergency contraceptives" article?

Proof postiive that one should not take Wiki at face value, particularly when arguing an opponents lack of critical thought.

[DinoDoc]

Did you know that if you wiki "Morning after pill" it takes you straight to the RU 486 entry in the "emergency contraceptives" article?

Defending stupidity with stupidity?