Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Are the rich paying their 'fair' share?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Al B. Sure!
    replied
    So we agree that there are non-monetary, non-taxable privileges of having money, right? Jon's talking about social advantages with regards to networking but I showed the low crime exposure provided by having enough wealth to afford a house in a wealthy area, even though the property taxes paid in absolute dollars are not sufficient to explain the disparity in crime rates.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jon Miller
    replied
    Originally posted by gribbler View Post
    Al, you don't have to convince us that Philly is a terrible place to live. We didn't choose to live there. And the government is never going to tax the intangible benefits of being middle class instead of broke, even if you consider that unfair.
    Yes, the wealth benefits of being middle class compared to poor are as important quality of life wise as the wealth benefits of being rich compared to middle class. (maybe more important, if there weren't so many poor people I wouldn't have a problem with rich people not wanting to be taxed)

    The fact that Albies example was middle class versus poor instead of middle class versus wealthy doesn't mean that his example does not demonstrate how wealth is not taxed.

    JM

    Leave a comment:


  • Al B. Sure!
    replied
    Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View Post
    He didn't say that the solution was absolute inequality.
    Or absolute lack of liberty, for that matter...

    Leave a comment:


  • Hauldren Collider
    replied
    He didn't say that the solution was absolute inequality.

    Leave a comment:


  • BlackCat
    replied
    Originally posted by Al B. Sure! View Post
    Equality is the enemy of liberty
    Oh, so you are a supporter of monarchy, even feudalism ?

    Leave a comment:


  • Jon Miller
    replied
    A consumption tax + transfers might be the best way to implement a tax, but it doesn't change the fact that the benefits of wealth are not being taxed by a consumption tax (such as networking).

    JM

    Leave a comment:


  • Hauldren Collider
    replied
    Originally posted by gribbler View Post
    We were pretty slow in taking the "all men are created equal" business seriously.
    It should be noted that having a nobility/aristocracy is very different from having an upper class.

    Leave a comment:


  • giblets
    replied
    Originally posted by Al B. Sure! View Post
    Median household income 20151: $103,899

    National median household income is less than half that.

    Privilege of being middle-class then if that is middle-class
    Yes, $100,000 is upper middle class. Very achievable for families with bachelor degrees if they don't waste their lives trying to get accepted into the armed forces.

    Leave a comment:


  • Al B. Sure!
    replied
    Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View Post
    A short story about equality by Kurt Vonnegut.
    Yeah I figured that out when I looked it up. We read it in high school. I remember the story, but not the name.

    It was historian Will Durant who said that, though. I'm paraphrasing a bit.

    "Nature smiles at the union of freedom and equality in our utopias.
    For freedom and equality are sworn and everlasting enemies, and
    when one prevails the other dies.
    Leave men free, and their natural
    inequalities will multiply almost geometrically, as in England and
    America in the nineteenth century under laissez-faire.
    To check the growth of inequality, liberty must be sacrificed,
    as in Russia after 1917. Even when repressed, inequality grows; only
    the man who is below the average in economic ability desires equality;
    those who are conscious of superior ability desire freedom,
    and in the end superior ability has its way.
    "

    Leave a comment:


  • giblets
    replied
    Originally posted by BlackCat View Post
    Wonder if someone would care to explain Al why there once was a revolution ?

    Though, it's quite curious that you yanks had that revolution that should make everyone equal and then accept that there are an "aristocracy" that can control society as they want.
    We were pretty slow in taking the "all men are created equal" business seriously.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hauldren Collider
    replied
    Originally posted by Al B. Sure! View Post


    Will Durant. Who the **** is Harrison Bergeron?
    A short story about equality by Kurt Vonnegut.

    Leave a comment:


  • Al B. Sure!
    replied
    Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View Post
    Harrison Bergeron


    Will Durant.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hauldren Collider
    replied
    Harrison Bergeron

    Also that equality revolution was the French Revolution, not the American Revolution. Observe the difference in results..

    Leave a comment:


  • Al B. Sure!
    replied
    Originally posted by BlackCat View Post
    Wonder if someone would care to explain Al why there once was a revolution ?

    Though, it's quite curious that you yanks had that revolution that should make everyone equal and then accept that there are an "aristocracy" that can control society as they want.
    Equality is the enemy of liberty

    Leave a comment:


  • Hauldren Collider
    replied
    Hey, it's not over $250k/year, so Obama says it's middle class

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X