Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Homophobia as self-hate

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Homophobia as self-hate



    Homophobia is more pronounced in individuals with an unacknowledged attraction to the same sex and who grew up with authoritarian parents who forbade such desires, a series of psychology studies demonstrates.
    The paper includes four separate experiments, conducted in the United States and Germany, with each study involving an average of 160 college students. The findings provide new empirical evidence to support the psychoanalytic theory that the fear, anxiety, and aversion that some seemingly heterosexual people hold toward gays and lesbians can grow out of their own repressed same-sex desires, Ryan says. The results also support the more modern self-determination theory, developed by Ryan and Edward Deci at the University of Rochester, which links controlling parenting to poorer self-acceptance and difficulty valuing oneself unconditionally.
    To explore participants' explicit and implicit sexual attraction, the researchers measured the discrepancies between what people say about their sexual orientation and how they react during a split-second timed task. Students were shown words and pictures on a computer screen and asked to put these in "gay" or "straight" categories. Before each of the 50 trials, participants were subliminally primed with either the word "me" or "others" flashed on the screen for 35 milliseconds. They were then shown the words "gay," "straight," "homosexual," and "heterosexual" as well as pictures of straight and gay couples, and the computer tracked precisely their response times. A faster association of "me" with "gay" and a slower association of "me" with "straight" indicated an implicit gay orientation.

    A second experiment, in which subjects were free to browse same-sex or opposite-sex photos, provided an additional measure of implicit sexual attraction.

    Through a series of questionnaires, participants also reported on the type of parenting they experienced growing up, from authoritarian to democratic. Students were asked to agree or disagree with statements like: "I felt controlled and pressured in certain ways," and "I felt free to be who I am." For gauging the level of homophobia in a household, subjects responded to items like: "It would be upsetting for my mom to find out she was alone with a lesbian" or "My dad avoids gay men whenever possible."

    Finally, the researcher measured participants' level of homophobia -- both overt, as expressed in questionnaires on social policy and beliefs, and implicit, as revealed in word-completion tasks. In the latter, students wrote down the first three words that came to mind, for example for the prompt "k i _ _." The study tracked the increase in the amount of aggressive words elicited after subliminally priming subjects with the word "gay" for 35 milliseconds.
    Guess there's evidence for what we all thought about many homophobic people. I don't know why they did the split second thing. They should hook people up to machines and see if they derive pleasure from gay imagery.
    "Flutie was better than Kelly, Elway, Esiason and Cunningham." - Ben Kenobi
    "I have nothing against Wilson, but he's nowhere near the same calibre of QB as Flutie. Flutie threw for 5k+ yards in the CFL." -Ben Kenobi

  • #2
    Ben
    "The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
    Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "

    Comment


    • #3
      Is this news?

      However, I suspect that plenty of homophobia is just a fear of the unknown/different and not self-hate.
      If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
      ){ :|:& };:

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Asher View Post
        Ben
        He's just waiting for the right woman. Specifically, a woman with a penis.
        <p style="font-size:1024px">HTML is disabled in signatures </p>

        Comment


        • #5
          Loin, didn't you get banned for posting specimens?

          Comment


          • #6
            Yep
            <p style="font-size:1024px">HTML is disabled in signatures </p>

            Comment


            • #7
              I don't really understand how the implicit association part was done. I've seen the racial version but the mechanics of this one seem different with the 35 millisecond 'me'/'others'. Anyone understand exactly what they were doing? Were gay homophobes more likely to erroneously put the primed 'me' images of straights in the gay category while the straights were more likely to put the 'me' images of gays in the straight category?
              "Flutie was better than Kelly, Elway, Esiason and Cunningham." - Ben Kenobi
              "I have nothing against Wilson, but he's nowhere near the same calibre of QB as Flutie. Flutie threw for 5k+ yards in the CFL." -Ben Kenobi

              Comment


              • #8
                I wonder about the methodology. Objectively, it's roughly equivalent one frame in a 30 fps format. But perceptually, 35 msec is a pretty long time, especially in a world where we've all been training to deal with quick-cut video.

                Not sayin' the study's invalid. Just wondering.
                Apolyton's Grim Reaper 2008, 2010 & 2011
                RIP lest we forget... SG (2) and LaFayette -- Civ2 Succession Games Brothers-in-Arms

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by -Jrabbit View Post
                  I wonder about the methodology. Objectively, it's roughly equivalent one frame in a 30 fps format. But perceptually, 35 msec is a pretty long time, especially in a world where we've all been training to deal with quick-cut video.

                  Not sayin' the study's invalid. Just wondering.
                  The outcome is very intuitive and is supported by all the scandals but I don't like the methodology. The people behind these tests are much more educated than me, but I think the implicit bias stuff smacks of Freudianism. When Santorum appeared to be about to call Obama a 'ni**er', psycho-linguists made it clear that such errors are not Freudian slips but errors in the complex mechanics of speech and cautioned against making judgments about one's beliefs from such errors. What's the difference between that and making mistakes in the implicit association tests? I think if the bias is consistent, psychologists who use the technique for this and other purposes (such as the racial bias test) may have a point, but I doubt the science is clear on this. Also of concern is how the racial and gender tests are put online and people are encouraged to take them; silly if people get worked up about the results of a single test; seems like bad psychology.

                  But it's cheaper than monitoring the pleasure centers of the brain while people view gay and straight imagery.
                  "Flutie was better than Kelly, Elway, Esiason and Cunningham." - Ben Kenobi
                  "I have nothing against Wilson, but he's nowhere near the same calibre of QB as Flutie. Flutie threw for 5k+ yards in the CFL." -Ben Kenobi

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    The general idea of commissioning, and paying for, a study is often to get the answer you want.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by regexcellent View Post
                      Loin, didn't you get banned for posting specimens?
                      Not long enough. Kind of like what I hear about his pecker.
                      Life is not measured by the number of breaths you take, but by the moments that take your breath away.
                      "Hating America is something best left to Mobius. He is an expert Yank hater.
                      He also hates Texans and Australians, he does diversify." ~ Braindead

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Braindead View Post
                        The general idea of commissioning, and paying for, a study is often to get the answer you want.
                        I agree. It seems like they were trying to get the result they wanted.

                        It's psychology, though. Not sure that's a real science.
                        "Flutie was better than Kelly, Elway, Esiason and Cunningham." - Ben Kenobi
                        "I have nothing against Wilson, but he's nowhere near the same calibre of QB as Flutie. Flutie threw for 5k+ yards in the CFL." -Ben Kenobi

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I remember reading about a similar study with the same result, but I think it was better

                          What they did was show men who claimed to be straight lesbian porn, and put sensors in their penises.
                          The ones who would get aroused and erections from watching 2 hot woman nude doing it, were less homophobic than the men who could not get hard from watching hot naked women, and who were probably gays in the closet.
                          I need a foot massage

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Were they paid for those studies? Because that sounds like a pretty awesome way to earn a 8 bucks an hour. "Watch some lesbian porn and tell us if it was any good."
                            If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
                            ){ :|:& };:

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Barnabas View Post
                              I remember reading about a similar study with the same result, but I think it was better

                              What they did was show men who claimed to be straight lesbian porn, and put sensors in their penises.
                              The ones who would get aroused and erections from watching 2 hot woman nude doing it, were less homophobic than the men who could not get hard from watching hot naked women, and who were probably gays in the closet.
                              Why didn't they just make it gay men and go the direct way?
                              "Flutie was better than Kelly, Elway, Esiason and Cunningham." - Ben Kenobi
                              "I have nothing against Wilson, but he's nowhere near the same calibre of QB as Flutie. Flutie threw for 5k+ yards in the CFL." -Ben Kenobi

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X