Tweet
Was it only the ZR-1 which had independent suspension back in the 80's then?
-
Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate. -
This says it has four wheel independent suspension so no leaf springs.Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.Comment
-
Honestly I don't know. I am just going by the wiki article which details the evolvement of the Corvette leaf springs. I do remember the ZR-1 was supposed to be a leap forward in Corvette suspension though. I was actually taken aback that the Corvettes still had leaf springs myself.Originally posted by Dinner View Post"I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton, 2003Comment
-
From the wiki article:Originally posted by Dinner View Post
Maybe it depends on what the definition of "is" is?C5 (1997–2004), C6 (2005–):
Front: Independent unequal-length double wishbones with transverse fiberglass mono-leaf spring mounted to allow for anti-roll effect. Rear: Independent unequal length double wishbones with transverse fiberglass mono-leaf spring mounted to allow for anti-roll effect.
In the C2 and subsequent generations, a leaf spring is mounted transversely in the chassis and used in conjunction with several independent suspension designs. Common to these post-C1 Corvettes, the leaf acts only as a spring, and not a suspension arm or a link. Because it is not required to stabilize the wheels, the leaf functions in much the same manner as a coil spring. This configuration obviates the drawbacks and imprecision associated with leaf springs in a traditional Hotchkiss suspension layout
"I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton, 2003Comment
-
Originally posted by Provost Harrison View PostYeah, 115 would be slow in a car of that size, 220 would be far better. Mine is about the same power as that but much lighter. At last I can get my revenge on the 3-series driving arseholes
Bet that your color scheme is way more dangerous and causing serious brain damage to those 3-series drivers
Yeah, 115 isn't that much if you want quick acceleration, but top speed isn't a problem - once gone 170 km/h and still had 2.000 rpm's left. Though, it was 3 o'clock in the night on a motorway crossing funen, som I didn't felt comfortable checking that unused resources.With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.
Steven WeinbergComment
-
Oh yeah baby
Speaking of Erith:
"It's not twinned with anywhere, but it does have a suicide pact with Dagenham" - Linda SmithComment
Comment