Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Anyone watching Obama's speech?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by kentonio View Post
    Dude I know I tend to call you an idiot, but please take this as a genuine response. You are very, very wrong about this. Iran is not Libya, and it's not Iraq. The Iranians have been building a program that means you can't just bomb it from the air and shut the whole thing down. US military commanders have made it very clear that all you can achieve by an air campaign is to delay the program by maybe a few months, maybe a few years tops. The cost of doing so would be to destroy the moderate faction in Iran, cause Iran to strike out against US and Israeli interests across the Middle East including a huge new wave of terrorist support, and potentially make them start hitting vessels in Hormuz and/or tossing missiles into Israel. It also means that the current near total support for sanctions is likely to dissolves as many countries will simply not support a US attack on another middle eastern country.

    You're right of course, a nuclear armed Iran is a scary, potentially dreadful thing, but the uncomfortable truth is that there is no easy answer. A non-nuclear air campaign is not sufficient, a land war would make Iraq look like a picnic, and sanctions will almost certainly not work. If Iran are as close as people think, they will dig in until the bomb is ready and then tell the world to go **** itself afterwards.

    TLDR: There is no easy win strategy.
    We don't often agree, but I think you are spot on here.

    Sadly, I don't believe that the sanctions will work and then we are faced with a true dilema. Do we accept a nuclear Iran or do we force regime change. One thing I had not really considered is that a nuclear strike could stop them...I hope and pray that an option other than that is used. Pandora needs to stay in the box she has been in since 1945.

    I have seen many analysis of the non nuclear consequences of a nuclear Iran and they are indeed quite frightening. Nearly all of them evaluate the situation to Iran being much more agressive in asserting its influence in the Midddle East as the possibility of repriasal in minimized. The Middle East could be facing a nightmare no matter what happens. Low level war seems nearly inevitable unless it is displaced by full scale war.

    It is quite depressing to me because I see no other options for the U.S. in the end other than abondon the ME (which I am sure we will not do) or to implement regime change in Iran. This one would be costly...in many different ways.
    "I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton, 2003

    Comment


    • #17
      I think we welcome Iran into the nuclear club, and tell them that if they attack their neighbors they are glass.

      JM
      Jon Miller-
      I AM.CANADIAN
      GENERATION 35: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.

      Comment


      • #18
        I wouldn't count on Iran being sane enough to let that deter them from passing out nukes to their terrorist buddies.
        If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
        ){ :|:& };:

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Jon Miller View Post
          I think we welcome Iran into the nuclear club, and tell them that if they attack their neighbors they are glass.

          JM
          You miss the point Jon. It is the level of the current type of subversive activities that they engage in that will become much more aggressive. They will have little fear retaliation because they will have been "welcomed to the nuclear club." It is not the use of their nukes that would embroil the ME in heightened levels of conflict, it is their mere possesion of them.
          "I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton, 2003

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View Post
            I wouldn't count on Iran being sane enough to let that deter them from passing out nukes to their terrorist buddies.
            All nuclear material has a "signature" detailing where it was made. If a terrorist group popped a an Iranian made nuke, then the world would hold Iran responsible. They might as well do it themselves.
            "I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton, 2003

            Comment


            • #21
              I doubt Iran would be that stupid. Let's be honest, for all the stuff we say about Iran, they aren't ridiculously irrational or stupid. The biggest fear, as PLATO has said is that Iran would perhaps be more aggressive in supplying its clients. But they are smart enough to stay somewhat under the radar enough to prevent full scale warfare.

              I don't think US intervention would really accomplish anything. I think we may have to resign ourselves to a nuclear Iran. Once the nuclear genie was out of the bottle it was only a matter of time before this occurred (not specifically Iran, but Iran-type countries).
              “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
              - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui View Post
                I doubt Iran would be that stupid. Let's be honest, for all the stuff we say about Iran, they aren't ridiculously irrational or stupid. The biggest fear, as PLATO has said is that Iran would perhaps be more aggressive in supplying its clients. But they are smart enough to stay somewhat under the radar enough to prevent full scale warfare.

                I don't think US intervention would really accomplish anything. I think we may have to resign ourselves to a nuclear Iran. Once the nuclear genie was out of the bottle it was only a matter of time before this occurred (not specifically Iran, but Iran-type countries).
                Agreed.
                Captain of Team Apolyton - ISDG 2012

                When I was younger I thought curfews were silly, but now as the daughter of a young woman, I appreciate them. - Rah

                Comment


                • #23
                  HC, have a read of this if you get a few minutes..

                  http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...an-attack.html

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Heh, "Israeli aggression."

                    I wouldn't call it aggression if the very existence of your country is at stake.

                    Hopefully Israel has the balls to do what we don't, just like every other time.

                    More importantly, Obama didn't call on the PA to recognize Israel's right to exist as a Jewish state, which is a pretty glaring omission. The PA is only willing to accept peace terms that leave open a pretext for future war, which should come as no surprise since it doesn't actually want peace in the first place.

                    More proof that Harper > Obama.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      So was Guy a big woman or was Obama really laying the groundwork for war?
                      I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
                      For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

                      Comment


                      • #27
                        Originally posted by regexcellent View Post
                        More importantly, Obama didn't call on the PA to recognize Israel's right to exist as a Jewish state, which is a pretty glaring omission.
                        Well, that sounds like an endorsement of theocracy.

                        Comment


                        • #28
                          Kind of like what the PA is?

                          Israel is a Jewish state in the sense that Jews live there and it is a homeland for the Jews. Refusing to recognize that just lays the groundwork for war later in order to make it not Jewish.

                          Every single Arab state is Muslim. Israel can damn well be Jewish.

                          Comment


                          • #29
                            Israel is Jewish in the same way that the UK is Anglican.
                            If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
                            ){ :|:& };:

                            Comment


                            • #30
                              Originally posted by DinoDoc View Post
                              So was Guy a big woman or was Obama really laying the groundwork for war?
                              I'll thank you not to comment on my weight.
                              "My nation is the world, and my religion is to do good." --Thomas Paine
                              "The subject of onanism is inexhaustable." --Sigmund Freud

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X