The Altera Centauri collection has been brought up to date by Darsnan. It comprises every decent scenario he's been able to find anywhere on the web, going back over 20 years.
25 themes/skins/styles are now available to members. Check the select drop-down at the bottom-left of each page.
Call To Power 2 Cradle 3+ mod in progress: https://apolyton.net/forum/other-games/call-to-power-2/ctp2-creation/9437883-making-cradle-3-fully-compatible-with-the-apolyton-edition
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Obama: "I'm going to eliminate three Departments -- Commerce, and, um..."
Can't you write concisely? There's a lot of garbage in there meant to obfuscate that you really don't know what you're talking about. If you want to add value to the conversation, start by doing so yourself. Preferably without posting obviously biased articles of dubious accuracy. Just saying.
just TLDR his stuff
the conversation is worthless anyways
nobody on the internet knows what they are talking about
"You say that it is your custom to burn widows. Very well. We also have a custom: when men burn a woman alive, we tie a rope around their necks and we hang them. Build your funeral pyre; beside it, my carpenters will build a gallows. You may follow your custom. And then we will follow ours."--General Sir Charles James Napier
Can't you write concisely? There's a lot of garbage in there meant to obfuscate that you really don't know what you're talking about.
Does your post help? This post specifically?
Preferably without posting obviously biased articles of dubious accuracy. Just saying.
Biased in favour of whom? Or against whom?
My point is that the foreign policy generally does not benefit from vague generalities about "overseas commitments" and "nation-building." They're no substitute for thorough research and analysis. And they're not a justification for defence cuts. Justifications for defence cuts exist if the benefit (reduced spending) exceeds the risk (cost to US foreign policy priorities).
"You say that it is your custom to burn widows. Very well. We also have a custom: when men burn a woman alive, we tie a rope around their necks and we hang them. Build your funeral pyre; beside it, my carpenters will build a gallows. You may follow your custom. And then we will follow ours."--General Sir Charles James Napier
Sad, really. I have. I've already roundly humiliated you for it. In fact, so have others. You've been effectively marginalized and are too thick to realize it.
“As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
"Capitalism ho!"
The Cold War is over. We won it. This is just like once you've taken over the risk board you keep moving armies around to piss off the other eliminated players until they decide to punch you in the face.
It's like you've already won a Domination victory and now you're just playing more turns for no purpose. It's time to end the world already.
“As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
"Capitalism ho!"
Can't you write concisely? There's a lot of garbage in there meant to obfuscate that you really don't know what you're talking about. If you want to add value to the conversation, start by doing so yourself. Preferably without posting obviously biased articles of dubious accuracy. Just saying.
He's a lawyer so he's probably grown accustomed to writing a whole lot of crap that says very little. But if you skim it and respond you might get caught on some technical detail.
Also, like Hera, stop DanSing all your posts. If you're that slow, take more time before hitting submit. At least Hera has the excuse of English not being his native language.
“As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
"Capitalism ho!"
He's a lawyer so he's probably grown accustomed to writing a whole lot of crap that says very little. But if you skim it and respond you might get caught on some technical detail.
I'm just surprised with how similar to Hera he is: the single-mindedness, the deafness to opposing views, the need for others engage his nonsense, the insecurity, the total lack of critical thinking and understanding of what critical thinking is.
“As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
"Capitalism ho!"
I'm just surprised with how similar to Hera he is: the single-mindedness, the deafness to opposing views, the need for others engage his nonsense, the insecurity, the total lack of critical thinking and understanding of what critical thinking is.
Why do you need him to be different than what he apparently is?
My point is that the foreign policy generally does not benefit from vague generalities about "overseas commitments" and "nation-building." They're no substitute for thorough research and analysis. And they're not a justification for defence cuts. Justifications for defence cuts exist if the benefit (reduced spending) exceeds the risk (cost to US foreign policy priorities).
And my point is that people need to eat in order to survive. But they can't just eat bread and water and expect to be healthy. They need protein and vitamins among other nutrients. Failure to realize this is distracting the issue. Tomorrow maybe Tuesday, but only on a Monday. But never on a Friday. Yet, some people insist posting these kinds of ideas, without considering their consequences. Once one does, it only leads to a series of problems. All of which I am nobly trying to solve here.
“As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
"Capitalism ho!"
Why do you need him to be different than what he apparently is?
I don't. I just get perverse pleasure from pointing it out. Really perverse. I shouldn't go further into it.
“As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
"Capitalism ho!"
I don't. I just get perverse pleasure from pointing it out. Really perverse. I shouldn't go further into it.
whatever floats your boat
personally, i prefer naked women
16-60 for the most part, no fatties and plez groom yourself... over 18 for legal reasons
strictly speaking, its the boobs and curves
“As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
"Capitalism ho!"
Legs can be nice. But below the fun parts, maybe only the feet can give me any kind of "job". So I've got other priorities. I could be happy with a dual-amputee... probably halfway up the thigh would be my limit.
Actually, I'd probably prefer that just cuz she couldn't run out on me. And if she had a motorized wheelchair, I could take out the batteries.
Although, I'd be doing most of the work. So I would have to consider the logistics. There may be some sort of rope and pulley system that could make things easier... like theater wires. But then I'd need the equivalent of stage hands. I suppose if I had maybe 3 amputee chicks, the other two could work the wires while my attention was focused on the one.
Tweet
Comment