Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Blackboards in Porn

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Blackboards in Porn

    Celebrating pornographers who go the extra mile when set dressing classroom porn and actually write something on the blackboard. What do they write, and is it correct?
    (Humour site - Intended to be safe for work)
    "Someone get this blogger a book deal!" - Salon


    Celebrating pornographers who go the extra mile when set dressing classroom porn and actually write something on the blackboard. What do they write, and is it correct?
    (Humour site - Intended to be safe for work)


    The latest entry.

    Originally posted by Blackboard
    45Rh
    102.906
    Rhodium

    9F
    18.998
    Fluorine

    4Be
    9.012
    Beryllium

    57La
    138.906
    Lanthanum

    C2H6O Example 1
    H H
    | |
    H-C-C-O-H
    | |
    H H
    And the commentary...

    Chemistry – A-level standard.

    Education cutbacks are clearly hitting hard – this establishment can only afford a periodic table with four elements, and a hand-drawn one at that. Though not displayed in the correct order, all the information about the elements is correct, with the exception of lanthanum’s atomic weight. According to IUPAC, to three decimal places this should be 138.905 instead of 138.906 (actually 138.90547, so the rounding error is not great). Analysing the history of IUPAC’s regular redefinitions of elements’ atomic weight (as scientists become more accurate in their measurements) it can be deduced that not only is this teacher using a hand-drawn periodic table containing only four elements, but that it is at least seven years old (lanthanum's atomic weight was first published as its current value in 2005) and possibly dates back as far as 1969 (when 138.9055 replaced the previous figure of 138.91). Highlighting tiny discrepancies in atomic weight may seem like nitpicking, but it is this kind of fourth decimal place analysis that led to the discovery of deuterium.

    What kind of chemistry can be taught using just these four elements is unclear - even the ancient Greeks thought there were at least five elements (according to Aristotle, air, fire, earth, water and aether - none of them actually elements). Fluorine will bond with pretty much anything, so that’s a good start, but not much useful can be made with them together. Lanthanum fluoride can be used as an ion-sensitive electrode, and beryllium fluoride is used in liquid-fluoride nuclear reactors, but you’d have a hard time making the rest of one with just rhodium and lanthanum. Indeed it is ironic that these impoverished students will be devoting a quarter of their time to studying rhodium, the most expensive element that it's actually possible to buy.

    What is also ironic is that none of these elements are actually used in Example 1, which uses the much more common (though sadly unknown to this institution) elements of hydrogen, carbon and oxygen to make ethanol. It would be more useful to give the molecular formula of C2H5OH rather than the empirical one, to distinguish it from dimethyl ether, but the structure shown is correct. It’s just a shame that it will mean as much to these students as lanthanum would have done to Aristotle.

    6/10 A good effort in trying economic times.

    (Many thanks to Vytautas for sending this picture in.)


    Hilarious.
    Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
    "We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld

  • #2
    Standards are indeed slipping...shame.
    Speaking of Erith:

    "It's not twinned with anywhere, but it does have a suicide pact with Dagenham" - Linda Smith

    Comment


    • #3
      C2H6O Example 1
      H H
      | |
      H-C-C-O-H
      | |
      H H
      This is incorrect.

      Should be

      C2H6O Example 1
      . . H H
      . . | |
      H-C-C-O-H
      . . | |
      . . H H
      "Just puttin on the foil" - Jeff Hanson

      “In a democracy, I realize you don’t need to talk to the top leader to know how the country feels. When I go to a dictatorship, I only have to talk to one person and that’s the dictator, because he speaks for all the people.” - Jimmy Carter

      Comment


      • #4
        Haha that site is awesome.

        Good find
        Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal!

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Lorizael View Post
          http://blackboardsinporn.blogspot.com/

          Celebrating pornographers who go the extra mile when set dressing classroom porn and actually write something on the blackboard. What do they write, and is it correct?
          (Humour site - Intended to be safe for work)


          The latest entry.



          And the commentary...

          Chemistry – A-level standard.

          Education cutbacks are clearly hitting hard – this establishment can only afford a periodic table with four elements, and a hand-drawn one at that. Though not displayed in the correct order, all the information about the elements is correct, with the exception of lanthanum’s atomic weight. According to IUPAC, to three decimal places this should be 138.905 instead of 138.906 (actually 138.90547, so the rounding error is not great). Analysing the history of IUPAC’s regular redefinitions of elements’ atomic weight (as scientists become more accurate in their measurements) it can be deduced that not only is this teacher using a hand-drawn periodic table containing only four elements, but that it is at least seven years old (lanthanum's atomic weight was first published as its current value in 2005) and possibly dates back as far as 1969 (when 138.9055 replaced the previous figure of 138.91). Highlighting tiny discrepancies in atomic weight may seem like nitpicking, but it is this kind of fourth decimal place analysis that led to the discovery of deuterium.

          What kind of chemistry can be taught using just these four elements is unclear - even the ancient Greeks thought there were at least five elements (according to Aristotle, air, fire, earth, water and aether - none of them actually elements). Fluorine will bond with pretty much anything, so that’s a good start, but not much useful can be made with them together. Lanthanum fluoride can be used as an ion-sensitive electrode, and beryllium fluoride is used in liquid-fluoride nuclear reactors, but you’d have a hard time making the rest of one with just rhodium and lanthanum. Indeed it is ironic that these impoverished students will be devoting a quarter of their time to studying rhodium, the most expensive element that it's actually possible to buy.

          What is also ironic is that none of these elements are actually used in Example 1, which uses the much more common (though sadly unknown to this institution) elements of hydrogen, carbon and oxygen to make ethanol. It would be more useful to give the molecular formula of C2H5OH rather than the empirical one, to distinguish it from dimethyl ether, but the structure shown is correct. It’s just a shame that it will mean as much to these students as lanthanum would have done to Aristotle.

          6/10 A good effort in trying economic times.

          (Many thanks to Vytautas for sending this picture in.)


          Hilarious.
          Reminds me of my commentary on Gang Bang Girl 26.
          "I hope I get to punch you in the face one day" - MRT144, Imran Siddiqui
          'I'm fairly certain that a ban on me punching you in the face is not a "right" worth respecting." - loinburger

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Ogie Oglethorpe View Post
            This is incorrect.

            Should be

            C2H6O Example 1
            . . H H
            . . | |
            H-C-C-O-H
            . . | |
            . . H H
            It's correct on the site.
            Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
            "We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld

            Comment


            • #7
              Socrates: "Good is That at which all things aim, If one knows what the good is, one will always do what is good." Brian: "Romanes eunt domus"
              GW 2013: "and juistin bieber is gay with me and we have 10 kids we live in u.s.a in the white house with obama"

              Comment


              • #8
                I approve.
                In Soviet Russia, Fake borises YOU.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Lorizael View Post
                  It's correct on the site.
                  I figured it out after I posted that poly's formatting screws it up.

                  Kudos to porn edumaction efforts.
                  "Just puttin on the foil" - Jeff Hanson

                  “In a democracy, I realize you don’t need to talk to the top leader to know how the country feels. When I go to a dictatorship, I only have to talk to one person and that’s the dictator, because he speaks for all the people.” - Jimmy Carter

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    We need pics to verify this
                    With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.

                    Steven Weinberg

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Ogie Oglethorpe View Post
                      This is incorrect.

                      Should be

                      C2H6O Example 1
                      . . H H
                      . . | |
                      H-C-C-O-H
                      . . | |
                      . . H H
                      Really?
                      “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
                      "Capitalism ho!"

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        The diagram is confusing... I get that "H" is for "hos" and "C" is for "cocks", but what is the "O" for? At first I was going to say "orgasm" but i don't see how that would get inbetween a **** and a ho. Does it depict an "oral" bond? Or is it for orangutan?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Stupid, I've studied chemistry and biochemistry for many years, and I can categorically tell you, the O means "onanism".
                          Speaking of Erith:

                          "It's not twinned with anywhere, but it does have a suicide pact with Dagenham" - Linda Smith

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I had to mention this. I'm reading it at the moment, and it's very funny:

                            Once More, with Feeling
                            by Victoria Coren and Charlie Skelton

                            Although since the 1970s it has developed a star system and its own festivals, porno remains denigrated by mainstream critics.

                            An exception was Dr Robert Stoller, professor of psychiatry at UCLA School of Medicine, who in 1991 published an ethnographic study of adult heterosexual pornography. Porn: Myths for the Twentieth Century featured lengthy interviews with hardcore workers who revealed that their aspirations, far from being deviant, were conformist, and the business functioned like its more "respectable" counterpart.

                            Victoria Coren and Charlie Skelton, more-or-less platonic friends from university, shared the job of reviewing porno movies for the Erotic Review. Once the novelty had worn off, they started to pay attention to what came in between the sex. Coren also believed there was a place for heterosexual porn in the home.

                            Coren and Skelton - the daughter of a humorist and the son of a clergyman - come from the sort of middle-class English stock that 100 years ago would have gone up the Orinoco or done missionary work. Had they come of age in the 1950s, they probably would have been Terence Conran or Mary Quant. But with the frontiers of good taste accounted for, they went exploring the off-the-map world of porn instead. They remain sketchy about how they were financed, but ambition has taken them further than most would-be film-makers. No one questioned their lack of qualification.

                            Their research trip to the US takes them into the shallow end of the hardcore pool and reassures them that the work need not be exploitative. Everyone they meet is articulate and motivated, verging on the evangelical.

                            Their quest is distracting enough for them not to notice that many are borderline bores. Their initial guide, Bill Margold, an old porn hand, was also interviewed by Stoller. Margold, an adroit monologuist, is more interesting in Stoller's study because Coren and Skelton's faux-naif approach employs a rhetorical style which makes Carrie Bradshaw's, in Sex and the City, appear the height of sophistication. Where a veteran like Margold reduces porn to its basic elements - "Get up, get in, get out, get off"- Coren and Skelton resort to endless faffing, try hard to be funny, and make tiresome speculations on what their daddies might think.
                            Chris Petit assesses a peculiarly English approach to porn, as revealed in Victoria Coren and Charlie Skelton's Once More, with Feeling, the journal of a blue movie
                            Vive la liberte. Noor Inayat Khan, Dachau.

                            ...patriotism is not enough. I must have no hatred or bitterness towards anyone. Edith Cavell, 1915

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Provost Harrison View Post
                              Stupid, I've studied chemistry and biochemistry for many years, and I can categorically tell you, the O means "onanism".

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X