How the **** should SCOTUS rule?

[Imran Siddiqui]

Ah yes, the "illegal things are illegal, legal things are legal, and I have no strong opinion one way or another because I'm a weasel milquetoast lawyer" mode of thinking.

Oh, pardon. I thought we were discussing how the Supreme Court should rule on a legal issue.

[DaShi]

Broken clocks are right twice a day.

You never responded to that article I posted that clearly showed how not in favor free speech they are. I'm pretty disappointed that you aren't letting evidence affect your perception and you've retreated into cognitive dissonance when it come to the Robert's Court and Free Speech.

Here is that article again.

http://www.acslaw.org/acsblog/the-ro...ouble-standard

I'm wholly convinced that HC simply lacks the ability to support the statements he makes. He repeats something he heard somewhere and then folds the minute it is challenged even slightly. This is CMU!

[MRT144]

Oh, pardon. I thought we were discussing how the Supreme Court should rule on a legal issue.

Which you haven't done because you are a milquetoast lawyer.

[Thorn]

Btw how does one bring a lawsuit to the supreme court on behalf of a plaintiff that is being held in secret and unannouced courts, isn't that a catch-22?

[Lonestar]

Obama runs America?

We elect a Dictator every 4 years, is my understanding of the political process.

[molly bloom]

I'm puzzled by what happens if Americans see buttocks or breasts or hear the occasional profanity on free to air television.

Do their eyes fall out ?

Do their ears start belching flame ?

Do their brains beat themselves against the interior of their skulls in wild frenzy ?

Given the amount of violent death you're allowed to see on U.S. television, I find it strange that people get worked up over uninjured naked bodies and words you can read in English literature...

[Lonestar]

I'm puzzled by what happens if Americans see buttocks or breasts or hear the occasional profanity on free to air television.

Do their eyes fall out ?

Do their ears start belching flame ?

Do their brains beat themselves against the interior of their skulls in wild frenzy ?

Given the amount of violent death you're allowed to see on U.S. television, I find it strange that people get worked up over uninjured naked bodies and words you can read in English literature...

[Lorizael]

We elect a Dictator every 4 years, is my understanding of the political process.

Then Obama really is a giant *****. At least W had the balls to do some crazy ****.

[Ming]

If you are offended by something you choose to watch, watch something else.
If you don't want your kids to see something, be a real parent and monitor/select/control what they can watch.

But don't force your version of morality down everybody's throat.

It's silly to have a different set of rules for over the air broadcasts and those on cable. Let the networks decide what they want to show.

[MRT144]

If you are offended by something you choose to watch, watch something else.
If you don't want your kids to see something, be a real parent and monitor/select/control what they can watch.

But don't force your version of morality down everybody's throat.

It's silly to have a different set of rules for over the air broadcasts and those on cable. Let the networks decide what they want to show.

Exactly.

[Guynemer]

Didn't read the thread.

Just wanted to state my support for boobies on the TV-lookie-box.

[MRT144]

Didn't read the thread.

Just wanted to state my support for boobies on the TV-lookie-box.

I think the old ****s that get riled up over boobies on TV probably think the next stop on their slippery slope is 6 minute still shots of labia.

[rah]

It's silly to have a different set of rules for over the air broadcasts and those on cable. Let the networks decide what they want to show.

Back in the old days of their only being broadcast TV and only 3 or 4 channels, having some standards probably made some sense. But that horse left the barn many years ago, and now it just seems silly.

[Jon Miller]

Didn't read the thread.

Just wanted to state my support for boobies on the TV-lookie-box.

I support that too.

Doesn't mean the argument that 'the government doesn't have the right to regulate' is idiotic.

If you think this is about 'boobs on the TV' then you are not looking at the big picture.

JM

[Ogie Oglethorpe]

Wide screen Double D boobies