An extremely gay question

[loinburger]

Some superheroes and supervillains, e.g. Multiple Man, can create duplicates of themselves. Would it be gay to cornhole yourself?

(Note that this is not the same as the classic "would it be gay to have sex with a clone of yourself," because in this case the duplicates share the same mind and will eventually merge back together.)

Also, in the movie Next, Nicholas Cage is able to see a few minutes into the future. Doubtless in some of these future excursions he serviced a glory hole. If non-hypothetically servicing a glory hole is 100% gay and not servicing a glory hole is 0% gay, then how gay is it to hypothetically service a glory hole a few minutes in the future?

[Mojotronica]

Great thread. It's definitely gay to have sex with a "multiple/clone/time duplicated" version of yourself. Hypothetical glory hole servicing is 100% not gay. Next looks like a terrible movie, but an exploration of hypothetical glory hole servicing might have saved it.

[MikeH]

This is the theme of the opening scene of the most recent season of Misfits.

[Egbert]

This thread makes tubgirl links look really tasteful, by comparison.

[Combat Ingrid]

What about Nicholas Cage servicing himself through a glory hole?

[BeBMan]

This thread is clearly on the wrong track. With duplicates of yourself it's not gay per se, but rather a more sophisticated version of masturbation.

[DaShi]

Exactly. Anyone who says that having sex with your clone is gay is a sexual deviant.

[MikeH]

Sex with a clone grown in a tank from DNA is gay.
Sex with a replica split from your body due to some super power is masturbation.

[Kidlicious]

This thread is clearly on the wrong track. With duplicates of yourself it's not gay per se, but rather a more sophisticated version of masturbation.

QFT