Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Obama, Ahmadinejad, and the toy lost on the playground

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Obama, Ahmadinejad, and the toy lost on the playground



    President Obama said Monday that the U.S. wants the top-secret aircraft back. "We have asked for it back. We'll see how the Iranians respond," Obama said during a White House news conference with Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki on Monday.

    In an interview broadcast live Monday night on Venezuelan state television, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said nothing to suggest his country would grant the U.S. request.
    "The Americans have perhaps decided to give us this spy plane," Ahmadinejad said. "We now have control of this plane."

    Speaking through an interpreter, Ahmadinejad said: "There are people here who have been able to control this spy plane, who can surely analyze this plane's system also. … In any case, now we have this spy plane."
    Anyone else find this all laughable and child-like?
    "Flutie was better than Kelly, Elway, Esiason and Cunningham." - Ben Kenobi
    "I have nothing against Wilson, but he's nowhere near the same calibre of QB as Flutie. Flutie threw for 5k+ yards in the CFL." -Ben Kenobi

  • #2
    I think it's horrendously naive and consequently dangerous for Obama to have asked for it back and even worse that he's displayed his foolishness in public before the press. There was never any chance for the Iranians to give it back. Asking implies that Obama entertained the possibility that they might respond to his soothing calls, like he's some kind of horse whisperer for third world dictatorships. Apparently he hasn't quite yet learned that the Iranians don't like to play nice.
    "You say that it is your custom to burn widows. Very well. We also have a custom: when men burn a woman alive, we tie a rope around their necks and we hang them. Build your funeral pyre; beside it, my carpenters will build a gallows. You may follow your custom. And then we will follow ours."--General Sir Charles James Napier

    Comment


    • #3
      Obama's Iran policy has always been incoherent. I want to know why the thing isn't designed to self destruct.

      We should hire Mossad to take it out or something ... they are actually capable of ****ing with Iran it seems, unlike our limpdicked president.
      If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
      ){ :|:& };:

      Comment


      • #4
        Self destruction probably got damaged. Or it stopped automatically, like in Galaxy Quest
        Blah

        Comment


        • #5
          Asking for it back is just protocol, it seems stupid and idiotic considering you were violating their airspace at the time, but then again most diplomatic acts sound stupid and idiotic in isolation.

          Comment


          • #6
            We did not violate their airspace. Their airspace invited us. It said, "ooh, big boy, I like that coat of paint," and we just couldn't resist. We were all up in that airspace All. Night. Long. Ooooh yeaaaahhhh.
            1011 1100
            Pyrebound--a free online serial fantasy novel

            Comment


            • #7
              You make it sound like violating their airspace is a bad idea

              On the other hand, letting them get nukes is a bad idea too.
              If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
              ){ :|:& };:

              Comment


              • #8
                What I don't understand is why the options to destroy the wreckage were so quickly dismissed. It seems to me that protecting our most valuable technology would be a national interest issue and would justify a strike. Am I thinking out of line here?
                "I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton, 2003

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Elok View Post
                  We did not violate their airspace. Their airspace invited us. It said, "ooh, big boy, I like that coat of paint," and we just couldn't resist. We were all up in that airspace All. Night. Long. Ooooh yeaaaahhhh.
                  I think it was a scientific weather research operation that went off-course.
                  Blah

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by PLATO View Post
                    What I don't understand is why the options to destroy the wreckage were so quickly dismissed. It seems to me that protecting our most valuable technology would be a national interest issue and would justify a strike. Am I thinking out of line here?
                    QFT

                    Obama was probably too scared to call a strike. "Bold" enough to launch a raid into Pakistan, not bold enough to drop a bomb in the middle of Nowhere, Iran?
                    If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
                    ){ :|:& };:

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Al B. Sure! View Post
                      http://www.usatoday.com/news/washing...one/51855044/1



                      Anyone else find this all laughable and child-like?
                      Possibly it's the way it's translated. I don't see how saying "we now own the spy plane" is necessarily childlike.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View Post
                        Obama's Iran policy has always been incoherent. I want to know why the thing isn't designed to self destruct.

                        We should hire Mossad to take it out or something ... they are actually capable of ****ing with Iran it seems, unlike our limpdicked president.
                        If they're so great and wonderful and can take out big bad Iran by themselves why do we need to keep pretending they're our "ally"?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View Post
                          You make it sound like violating their airspace is a bad idea

                          On the other hand, letting them get nukes is a bad idea too.
                          So, uh, you're saying you would have made the exact same decision as Obama and you would have sent spy planes into Iran? But you still think his policy is "incoherent" because someone else didn't design the planes to self-destruct?

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by BeBro View Post
                            I think it was a scientific weather research operation that went off-course.
                            Of course. We only wanted to know weather we could get away with it!
                            1011 1100
                            Pyrebound--a free online serial fantasy novel

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Elok View Post
                              We did not violate their airspace. Their airspace invited us. It said, "ooh, big boy, I like that coat of paint," and we just couldn't resist. We were all up in that airspace All. Night. Long. Ooooh yeaaaahhhh.
                              It is a bit like breaking into someone's house, dropping something of yours, and calling them up asking for it back.
                              "Flutie was better than Kelly, Elway, Esiason and Cunningham." - Ben Kenobi
                              "I have nothing against Wilson, but he's nowhere near the same calibre of QB as Flutie. Flutie threw for 5k+ yards in the CFL." -Ben Kenobi

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X