Medex sucks, bring us back Wiglaf.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Breaking News: People Who Watch FOX News are Ignorant
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by MikeH View PostOf course you get extreme left bat**** anti-sciencers.
One large group would be the anti-animal testing nuts. Or anti GM.I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett Kavanaugh
Comment
-
I like Medex. He's a decent substitute for Ben and apparently more sane if the truth be told.Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Oerdin View PostI like Medex. He's a decent substitute for Ben and apparently more sane if the truth be told.
I watch fox news every now and then. I think everyone should. Anyone that relies on a single source for news is more likely to acquire a similar bias as the source. By watching many you get a better all around picture. And fox news can be really entertaining.It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O
Comment
-
Originally posted by rah View PostWell the bar was set quite low.
I watch fox news every now and then. I think everyone should. Anyone that relies on a single source for news is more likely to acquire a similar bias as the source. By watching many you get a better all around picture. And fox news can be really entertaining.“As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
"Capitalism ho!"
Comment
-
A lot of the facts are the same. They just like to ignore a lot of them and misrepresent the ones they do mention.
And if you have half a brain you can recognize when they're misleading.
And with any source, verification is always necessary.
It's always valuable to know what the other sides believe (even if they're wrong)It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O
Comment
-
A lot of the difference is simply in the way they prioritize information, not the actual information itself. The Guardian will post a story about some random guy getting executed in Texas, while Fox News will report on some Obama mini-scandal. Both articles are factual, but presenting them at all demonstrates a political bent.
I agree with reading multiple sources. Personally, I read Wall Street Journal, Washinton Post, occasionally Fox News and a handful of other sites if an article looks interesting. I used to read the Guardian and the Telegraph a bit to get some international perspective but the Guardian just pissed me off too much.If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
){ :|:& };:
Comment
-
When he says multiple sources, I think he means multiple sources of different bents. Two of your three publications are Murdoch publications, and the other is the WaPo..."The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "
Comment
-
Originally posted by rah View PostA lot of the facts are the same. They just like to ignore a lot of them and misrepresent the ones they do mention.
And if you have half a brain you can recognize when they're misleading.
And with any source, verification is always necessary.
It's always valuable to know what the other sides believe (even if they're wrong)“As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
"Capitalism ho!"
Comment
-
Just so you realize that some of those that you're talking about are on the other side of the political spectrum and lap up the same from liberal biased sources.
But I will concede that more of them seem to be on the right these days. *hangs head in shame*It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O
Comment
-
Originally posted by gribbler View PostAnything that doesn't share his bias would just piss him off too much.
Note that the premise of this thread is ignoring a news outlet because it doesn't share your biases.Last edited by Hauldren Collider; November 11, 2011, 15:47.If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
){ :|:& };:
Comment
-
Originally posted by Asher View PostWhen he says multiple sources, I think he means multiple sources of different bents. Two of your three publications are Murdoch publications, and the other is the WaPo...
Oh, are you going to pretend it's a conservative newspaper again?If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
){ :|:& };:
Comment
Comment