Tweet
My first copycat.In 3e Ranger sucked, and in 3.5 there was some revamp in spells, specially regarding duration. Can't remember anything else?I wouldn't call it THAT big of a difference. What is your opinion?
-
-
Why was there a need for a new edition after the second one? That one worked fine. /grumpyoldman -
I prefer 4e...but I'm a dnd noobIf there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
){ :|:& };:Comment
-
Only 1st and 2nd editions are actual AD&D. The rest are crap.Last edited by Dinner; October 12, 2011, 14:20.Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.Comment
-
The rest don't claim to be AD&D.Originally posted by Oerdin View PostClick here if you're having trouble sleeping.
"We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La RochefoucauldComment
-
Nah, 1st Ed all the way with me - D&D started going downhill when they brought out Unearthed Arcana...Comment
-
What is the key differences between 1st ed and 2nd ed?
Most my experiment is with 3/3.5 ed, but I have some knowledge of 2/2.5/4 ed.
JMJon Miller-
I AM.CANADIAN
GENERATION 35: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.Comment
-
Elves became a race instead of a class.Originally posted by Jon Miller View PostClick here if you're having trouble sleeping.
"We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La RochefoucauldComment
-
No, wait. Elves were already a race in AD&D 1st edition. The confusion may arise because there was Basic D&D (where races were classes), then AD&D 1st (where races are races) and then it continued with AD&D 2nd. Then TSR collapsed and Wizards took over, creating D&D 3rd edition, 3.5e and now 4e.
There aren't many differeces between AD&D 1st and AD&D 2nd, at least if you compare with the differences between 2nd and 3rd. The most important was, I think, the introduction of a skill system (with things like riding, cooking, shoe-making(?), instruments, etc) in 2dn edition which was, why deny it, quite crappy. In 3e they revamped it and did something more reasonable which was actually quite good.Comment
-
They were called non-weapon proficiencies then, not skills.Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
"We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La RochefoucauldComment
-
Yes, you are right. I was trying to remember the name.Comment
-
One of the few times someone says I'm right about something on Apolyton, and it's about D&D. /me sighs.Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
"We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La RochefoucauldComment
-
No, there's only a small difference between 3.0 and 3.5. Making bard the favored class of gnomes hardly qualifies as a big difference.John Brown did nothing wrong.Comment
-
There are far worse things which you could be right about.Originally posted by Lorizael View Post
Say for instance, the proper way to run a gay train on a burro.I have more issues than Marvel Comics and more problems than a math text book.Comment
-
Why does everyone hate 4e? Everyone plays 3.5 here at CMU.If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
){ :|:& };:Comment
Comment