(I'm bringing it back, baby!)
Short summary:
	
		
And by social aspects, they mean environmental groups who are upset that this will make us less frantic about carbon.  Personally, I don't know that it's really possible for most of the world to be less frantic about carbon, at least in practical terms.  Also, I'm all for quick-fix/half-assed solutions to otherwise intractable problems.  Of course, there is the risk that they will spray so much sulphate that it will...kill us all somehow, second ice age or something, I don't know but I'm sure somebody will say it.  Also, yes, Climate Change is a myth to channel money into the pockets of the powerful solar panel industry and away from other, less-connected industrialists.
Anyway, geo-engineering: what's your opinion?
					Short summary:
			
			
				A pioneering test of a climate "tech fix" planned for October faces a six-month delay as scientists discuss the issues it raises with their critics.
The test is part of the UK-based Stratospheric Particle Injection for Climate Engineering (Spice) project.
It would use a balloon and a kilometre-long hose to spray water into the upper atmosphere - a prelude to spraying climate-cooling sulphate particles.
But the funders believe that more talks about the social aspects are needed.
	The test is part of the UK-based Stratospheric Particle Injection for Climate Engineering (Spice) project.
It would use a balloon and a kilometre-long hose to spray water into the upper atmosphere - a prelude to spraying climate-cooling sulphate particles.
But the funders believe that more talks about the social aspects are needed.
Anyway, geo-engineering: what's your opinion?
	
 @ OP
){ :|:& };:
							
						
Comment