Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Social Security: Why would the checks stop?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    I'm sure the iou's don't count. So reducing them will not reduce the national debt.
    I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
    - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

    Comment


    • #17
      The United States public debt is a measure of the obligations of the United States federal government and is presented by the United States Treasury in two components and one total:

      * Debt Held by the Public, representing all federal[1] securities held by institutions or individuals outside the United States Government;
      * Intragovernmental Holdings, representing U.S. Treasury securities held in accounts which are administered by the United States Government, such as the OASI Trust fund administered by the Social Security Administration; and
      * Total Public Debt Outstanding, which is the sum of the above components.[2]
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_public_debt
      Sending social security checks will replace intragovernmental holdings with debt held by the public, and won't change the size of the national debt. So the debt ceiling can't possibly prevent social security checks from being sent since it's a limit on the size of the national debt, not debt held by the public.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by gribbler View Post
        Yes, the IOU's in the Social Security trust fund are part of the national debt. When social security checks are sent, the size of the trust fund decreases and the debt held by the public (debts that people actually bought) increases but there is no change in the national debt.
        I can't post links, but I read that the ious don't count.
        I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
        - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by gribbler View Post
          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_public_debt
          Sending social security checks will replace intragovernmental holdings with debt held by the public, and won't change the size of the national debt. So the debt ceiling can't possibly prevent social security checks from being sent since it's a limit on the size of the national debt, not debt held by the public.
          Interesting. Thanks
          I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
          - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Guynemer View Post
            One of the many, many, many problems with our country is that one political party has little interest in governing, and the other party has none.

            Which party is which is as changable as the weather.
            Iraq war doesn't happen with a democrat in the White House.
            "I hope I get to punch you in the face one day" - MRT144, Imran Siddiqui
            'I'm fairly certain that a ban on me punching you in the face is not a "right" worth respecting." - loinburger

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by MRT144 View Post
              Iraq war doesn't happen with a democrat in the White House.
              They simply choose another unnecessary country to invade given the Libya example.
              I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
              For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by DinoDoc View Post
                They simply choose another unnecessary country to invade given the Libya example.
                Obviously our never ending war in Libya will cost trillions over 8 years. What, with our ground presence and the insurgency we're fighting.
                "I hope I get to punch you in the face one day" - MRT144, Imran Siddiqui
                'I'm fairly certain that a ban on me punching you in the face is not a "right" worth respecting." - loinburger

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by MRT144 View Post
                  Obviously our never ending war in Libya will cost trillions over 8 years.
                  Similar to the War on Poverty.
                  I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
                  For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Don't expect DD to make sense.
                    “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
                    "Capitalism ho!"

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Guynemer View Post
                      Oh **** that noise.
                      You can take Carl Levin's seat.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by MRT144 View Post
                        Iraq war doesn't happen with a democrat in the White House.
                        Wouldn't be so sure about that. Clinton bombed the **** out of Iraq during his presidency and 9/11 made people on both sides of the aisle crazy.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by DaShi View Post
                          Don't expect DD to make sense.
                          That's a given.
                          "I hope I get to punch you in the face one day" - MRT144, Imran Siddiqui
                          'I'm fairly certain that a ban on me punching you in the face is not a "right" worth respecting." - loinburger

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by Tupac Shakur View Post
                            Wouldn't be so sure about that. Clinton bombed the **** out of Iraq during his presidency and 9/11 made people on both sides of the aisle crazy.
                            Imagine Al ****ing Gore for a minute. This revisionist idea that it was inevitable has got to be stopped.
                            "I hope I get to punch you in the face one day" - MRT144, Imran Siddiqui
                            'I'm fairly certain that a ban on me punching you in the face is not a "right" worth respecting." - loinburger

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              The only difference with Gore in charge is that the US would've invaded Iraq looking for ManBearPig rather than WMDs.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by Kidicious View Post
                                I'm sure the iou's don't count. So reducing them will not reduce the national debt.
                                There are no IOUs and instead they are Treasury Bonds which, yes, are the very definition of the National Debt and so is counted.
                                Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X