Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

FCC Commish who approved controversial NBC/Comcast merger leaves FCC with cushy Comcast job

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • FCC Commish who approved controversial NBC/Comcast merger leaves FCC with cushy Comcast job

    Guess the political party.



    After approving NBC buyout, FCC Commish becomes Comcast lobbyist
    By Nate Anderson | Published 27 minutes ago


    Meredith Attwell Baker, one of the two Republican Commissioners at the Federal Communications Commission, plans to step down—and right into a top lobbying job at Comcast-NBC.

    The news, reported this afternoon by the Wall Street Journal, The Hill, and Politico, comes after the hugely controversial merger of Comcast and NBC earlier this year. At the time, Baker objected to FCC attempts to impose conditions on the deal and argued that the "complex and significant transaction" could "bring exciting benefits to consumers that outweigh potential harms."

    Four months after approving the massive transaction, Attwell Baker will take a top DC lobbying job for the new Comcast-NBC entity, according to reports.

    The response of groups like Free Press was expected in its anger, but not without merit. "No wonder the public is so nauseated by business as usual in Washington—where the complete capture of government by industry barely raises any eyebrows," said Free Press' Craig Aaron. "The continuously revolving door at the FCC continues to erode any prospects for good public policy. We hope—but won't hold our breath—that her replacement will be someone who is not just greasing the way for their next industry job."

    Such cash-ins, of course, are a bipartisan affair in Washington.

    Attwell Baker this afternoon released a statement once the news broke, explaining that she would leave on June 3 and that she was "privileged to have had the opportunity to serve the country at a time of critical transformation in the telecommunications industry. The continued deployment of our broadband infrastructures will meaningfully impact the lives of all Americans. I am happy to have played a small part in this success."
    "The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
    Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "

  • #2
    Working for Comcast? Fine.
    Cushy job? Whatever.

    AS A LOBBYIST? This really should be illegal.
    Apolyton's Grim Reaper 2008, 2010 & 2011
    RIP lest we forget... SG (2) and LaFayette -- Civ2 Succession Games Brothers-in-Arms

    Comment


    • #3
      Yes. It really should.

      No. It never, ever, EVER will be.


      We've already had class warfare in this country. We lost.
      "My nation is the world, and my religion is to do good." --Thomas Paine
      "The subject of onanism is inexhaustable." --Sigmund Freud

      Comment


      • #4
        Making lobbyists illegal would be retarded. You should be allowed to pay for someone to advocate you to Congress. If you really want to fix this problem you need to give businesses less of a reason to try to lobby, which means you need to reduce the size of the federal government. The more federal dollars (or tax exemptions) Congress is able to dole out, the more incentive there is to hire lobbyists. This is really pretty obvious stuff, you can't increase the size of government without increasing the private sector's desire to influence it.

        The other thing you have to do is pay federal bureaucrats more. They get paid two to three times as much in the private sector because we pay federal employees too much at the lower levels and too little at the upper levels. Who wouldn't move?

        And Guy, I honestly am not sure you know what class warfare is...
        If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
        ){ :|:& };:

        Comment


        • #5
          By the way, Asher, this is equally common among Democrats as it is among Republicans, before you start getting your rant on.
          If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
          ){ :|:& };:

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View Post
            Making lobbyists illegal would be retarded. You should be allowed to pay for someone to advocate you to Congress. If you really want to fix this problem you need to give businesses less of a reason to try to lobby, which means you need to reduce the size of the federal government. The more federal dollars (or tax exemptions) Congress is able to dole out, the more incentive there is to hire lobbyists. This is really pretty obvious stuff, you can't increase the size of government without increasing the private sector's desire to influence it.

            The other thing you have to do is pay federal bureaucrats more. They get paid two to three times as much in the private sector because we pay federal employees too much at the lower levels and too little at the upper levels. Who wouldn't move?

            And Guy, I honestly am not sure you know what class warfare is...
            So your solution to reducing the power of big business is to give big business more power?
            “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
            "Capitalism ho!"

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View Post
              By the way, Asher, this is equally common among Democrats as it is among Republicans, before you start getting your rant on.
              Equally common? Cite!
              “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
              "Capitalism ho!"

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by DaShi View Post
                So your solution to reducing the power of big business is to give big business more power?
                Reducing the size of the government's budget (which is really the key thing in terms of reducing the incentive to lobby) is not the same as giving more power to big business. I'm talking about political power, and cutting government cuts everyone's political power. Except perhaps state & local government.
                If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
                ){ :|:& };:

                Comment


                • #9
                  Ok, now I have to refer you to the thread I made about never leaving your house.
                  “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
                  "Capitalism ho!"

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Lobbying government is free speech IMO and is therefore protected. OTOH, there is nothing wrong with preventing former government employees from lobbying within their former areas of purview for a period of a few years.
                    We need seperate human-only games for MP/PBEM that dont include the over-simplifications required to have a good AI
                    If any man be thirsty, let him come unto me and drink. Vampire 7:37
                    Just one old soldiers opinion. E Tenebris Lux. Pax quaeritur bello.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Well said, Spencer.

                      HC, you're a pretty naive kid, and adorable in your self-assurance that the same tropes you parrot so consistently are the answer to all political situations.

                      The lobbyist system further empowers the rich and powerful (corporations, professional associations, etc.), and it has grown far out of control. However, no one here (except you) suggested the entire concept of lobbying should be outlawed. What we have is a very blatant example of a government regulator (and presidential appointee) jumping into bed with those she regulated, with the stated intention of influencing policy. The line from Baker's vote on the Comcast deal to her new employment is short and straight. It raises serious questions of propriety, and this should concern everyone.

                      I agree that this is not a party-based issue. Dems, GOPs, and military are equally (and constantly) guilty of this behavior, and it is antithetical to the public interest (which is what the FCC, e.g., is supposed to be minding).

                      But all you can do is use it as an excuse to bleat your party line, which is only tangentially (if that) relevant here. Kind of sad.
                      Apolyton's Grim Reaper 2008, 2010 & 2011
                      RIP lest we forget... SG (2) and LaFayette -- Civ2 Succession Games Brothers-in-Arms

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View Post
                        Making lobbyists illegal would be retarded. You should be allowed to pay for someone to advocate you to Congress. If you really want to fix this problem you need to give businesses less of a reason to try to lobby, which means you need to reduce the size of the federal government. The more federal dollars (or tax exemptions) Congress is able to dole out, the more incentive there is to hire lobbyists. This is really pretty obvious stuff, you can't increase the size of government without increasing the private sector's desire to influence it.

                        The other thing you have to do is pay federal bureaucrats more. They get paid two to three times as much in the private sector because we pay federal employees too much at the lower levels and too little at the upper levels. Who wouldn't move?

                        And Guy, I honestly am not sure you know what class warfare is...
                        Luckily, Molotov Cocktails laced with high phosphorus fertilizer are dirt cheap.


                        (remember kids, don't mix bleach and windex at home....)
                        Libraries are state sanctioned, so they're technically engaged in privateering. - Felch
                        I thought we're trying to have a serious discussion? It says serious in the thread title!- Al. B. Sure

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View Post
                          And Guy, I honestly am not sure you know what class warfare is...
                          Do you? No.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Guynemer View Post
                            Yes. It really should.

                            No. It never, ever, EVER will be.


                            We've already had class warfare in this country. We lost.
                            Who the **** is "we", 6-figure man?
                            12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
                            Stadtluft Macht Frei
                            Killing it is the new killing it
                            Ultima Ratio Regum

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              We = everyone not in politics and/or paying politicians off.
                              "My nation is the world, and my religion is to do good." --Thomas Paine
                              "The subject of onanism is inexhaustable." --Sigmund Freud

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X