Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

A Game of Thrones - TV Show Discussion Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • self biased
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • self biased
    replied
    Originally posted by regexcellent View Post
    You know who needs another scene? Or several other scenes? STRONG BELWAS.
    Strong Belwas is a freaking badass in the books.

    Leave a comment:


  • regexcellent
    replied
    Originally posted by Patroklos View Post
    Dontos really needed another scene to, it would have put book readers and show watches much closer together.
    You know who needs another scene? Or several other scenes? STRONG BELWAS. They're gonna make Daario
    Spoiler:
    **** on Oznak's corpse,
    it's a ****ing travesty.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sparta28
    replied
    Love it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dinner
    replied
    Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View Post
    "die in a fire" is a rather harsh sentence for having a different opinion about a book. You'd think Oerdin was a member of the Taliban talking about the Quran.
    It is just a turn of phrase and not meant literally.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dinner
    replied
    Originally posted by regexcellent View Post
    Jesus Christ when did I ever complain about the book's detail?
    Sorry, I guess it was your brother who did that. You two start to blend together in my mind sometimes.

    Leave a comment:


  • self biased
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • Ming
    replied
    Originally posted by DinoDoc View Post
    I dunno. I kinda liked Paul Blackthorne in that role. Or were you talking about the actress that played Lt. Karin Murphy? She played it well enough but I never really bought her as a Chicago cop. Was still pissed when Sci Fi cancelled it though. Never really understood that decision. I thought it had good ratings given the network it was on.

    Let' see... Harry is a 6 foot plus LARGE guy who gets physical. And while I really do like Paul Blackthorne, and will admit he played the role well, HE WASN'T HARRY.
    And not only did she not look like a tough Chicago Cop, she had the wrong hair color.

    But besides those "little" problems, I still liked that show and was also very pissed when the deep sixed it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hauldren Collider
    replied
    "die in a fire" is a rather harsh sentence for having a different opinion about a book. You'd think Oerdin was a member of the Taliban talking about the Quran.

    Leave a comment:


  • Patroklos
    replied
    Dontos really needed another scene to, it would have put book readers and show watches much closer together.

    Leave a comment:


  • regexcellent
    replied
    Originally posted by Dinner View Post
    There is also one of those extraneous book details which reg hates so much. It's buried in seemingly innocent text which he, no doubt, glossed over several books ago but which now turn out to be crucial. Reg needs to die in a fire like the rest of the kuchibros with low attention spans.
    Jesus Christ when did I ever complain about the book's detail?

    Leave a comment:


  • rah
    replied
    All I can say, is that I read the books, (not all of them but at least up to this point) but it was so long ago I don't remember all the details so I had an idea about it but wasn't sure. After the comments here that there were enough clues in the show, I went back and skimmed the books to see, and then me and my wife rewatched the episode. You can't tell watching the show unless you know what happened and even then it's pretty damn subtle.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lorizael
    replied
    Originally posted by Bugs ****ing Bunny View Post
    No. And it's only "obvious" to the readers because they've had a certain storyline spoon-fed to them.

    Presumably it was poison- but was it in the pie, or one of the two drinks he was seen drinking? Or was it slipped to him at the earlier breakfast? Was it slow-acting or fast-acting? We don't know.

    Cue book-readers going "AHAHAHAHAHA, FOOLISH MORTAL! IT WAS OBVIOUS BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT Grrr MARTIN SAID!".

    Anyway, my money is on Tywin doing it.
    Oo, biting.

    ...

    There were a few different theories as to who killed Joffrey. This episode provided pretty solid circumstantial evidence about one of those theories. No, the evidence in this past episode wasn't obvious, which is why I was curious about whether non-book-readers had noticed.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dinner
    replied
    Originally posted by Bugs ****ing Bunny View Post
    No. And it's only "obvious" to the readers because they've had a certain storyline spoon-fed to them.

    Presumably it was poison- but was it in the pie, or one of the two drinks he was seen drinking? Or was it slipped to him at the earlier breakfast? Was it slow-acting or fast-acting? We don't know.

    Cue book-readers going "AHAHAHAHAHA, FOOLISH MORTAL! IT WAS OBVIOUS BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT Grrr MARTIN SAID!".

    Anyway, my money is on Tywin doing it.
    All those nice little details about poisons and how they act. It would have been nice if someone had bothered to tell us about them, huh? Any way, lots of possibilities.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dinner
    replied
    There is also one of those extraneous book details which reg hates so much. It's buried in seemingly innocent text which he, no doubt, glossed over several books ago but which now turn out to be crucial. Reg needs to die in a fire like the rest of the kuchibros with low attention spans.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X