Tweet
Let's say there's a peeping Tom and he can look at a naked woman with his binoculars and it is very unlikely anyone else would ever know. He would enjoy this because he's a pervert. Is he morally obligated to voyeurism because of the net increase in happiness?
-
-
There's no accounting for taste."I hope I get to punch you in the face one day" - MRT144, Imran Siddiqui
'I'm fairly certain that a ban on me punching you in the face is not a "right" worth respecting." - loinburger -
No, there is a 3-7% chance that during one of his voyeuristic escapades he will inadvertently spy upon Tubgirl, which will result in a net decrease in happiness.<p style="font-size:1024px">HTML is disabled in signatures
</p>Comment
-
No, the 4-8% chance of spying a dickgirl makes it worth it.Originally posted by loinburger View PostComment
-
The answer is yes, but only if he posts pictures on the internet.If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
){ :|:& };:Comment
Comment