Originally posted by Oerdin
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Stupid Californians
Collapse
X
-
Keep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron O
-
Originally posted by Ming View PostThat's still a far "shot" from saying MOSTTry http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ming View PostAgain... you might want to use the figures you supplied to show how misinformed or brainwashed they are, but they don't show anything about bigoted or racist beliefs... What's undeniable is that you are just pulling this out of your ass...
I mean just because they never had a reaction like that to a white person and suddenly developed irrational beliefs against a black person, and we're talking waaaayyyy the **** out there irrational, that has no bearing on the fact that he's black, right? Let's pretend we're both adults. Let's admit the ****ing obvious. The reason so many **** bag extremists are upset is because of the man's race. The Republican Party is deliberately pandering to racists and the majority of their primary voters are siding with racists but... There is a slight chance that they, super secretly, aren't racist. Is that you point? If so it's a ****ing retarded point because they're obviously bigots desperately looking for a chance to manifest their bigotry and, yes, they are THE MAJORITY of their party.Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Oerdin View PostDumb. You're just dumb. I post links and you post this nonsense? Even my sources are creditable unless you think U.S. News and World Reports is some secret leftist group. What do you offer? Nothing. As is usual.Keep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron O
Comment
-
SCOTUS has refused to hear the latest birther case. I think they're covering for the foreigner."I have never killed a man, but I have read many obituaries with great pleasure." - Clarence Darrow
"I didn't attend the funeral, but I sent a nice letter saying I approved of it." - Mark Twain
Comment
-
Originally posted by Oerdin View PostYeah... I get it. They're just "brainwashed" against a half black man but his race isn't remotely a factor, right?
I don't accept your "smell" as proof...Keep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron O
Comment
-
"Just because 51% are professing a racist belief and 22% are flirting with a racist belief doesn't mean they're all racist. I mean 27% of them clearly are not racist."
If that's why you want to argue then cool but the majority are endorsing a racist idea and the VAST MAJORTY either endorse or are flirting with a racist idea so, yeah, the other 27% aren't racist but as a generalization it seems perfectly fine when talking about 73% of the Republican Party's base. Including the people who actually run the party because they're clearly a bunch of bigots. Republican politicians are certainly tripping over themselves to pander to the bigots so it's a damn good generalization. If you want to continue associating with such a group, fine, but don't whine when people call a spade a spade.Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Oerdin View Post"Just because 51% are professing a racist belief and 22% are flirting with a racist belief doesn't mean they're all racist. I mean 27% of them clearly are not racist."
Just pure BS on your part.Keep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron O
Comment
-
Ming thinks the mathematics of statical analysis is open to question. OK, if you think the study's subject size is too small please tell me what you think would be a large enough sample size. How small does the margin of error have to be before you admit what proffessionals have already seen using standard statical methods?Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ming View PostSince when is believing the propaganda that Obama isn't a US citizen a racist belief?
Just pure BS on your part.Since for ****ing ever? It's so ****ing obvious it is god damned transparent. You expect me to believe that the largest race issue in the history of our nation isn't the dominating factor in these sudden manifestations of completely irrational beliefs against black people? What were you, born yesterday?
Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.
Comment
-
'Conservatives' are much less willing to vote for women, hispanics, homosexuals, atheists, etc.
However moderate Republicans do exist
Comment
-
"Yeah, just because the majority endorse racist ideas and that majority controls the party that doesn't mean the party is racist or panders to racists." Nope, not at all. It's not like they're playing to pre-existing racism and that racists aren't claiming the, half black President of the United States, is a secret illegal alien on purely racist grounds even though they have never done so against white people. Spin me another fairy tale, Brother's Grim. Just because the Republicans are CONSTANTLY spewing racist garbage, and have decades of being racist, we should give them the benefit of the doubt when their motivations are utterly transparent for anyone with half a brain? It's clear as day.Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Oerdin View PostMing thinks the mathematics of statical analysis is open to question. OK, if you think the study's subject size is too small please tell me what you think would be a large enough sample size. How small does the margin of error have to be before you admit what proffessionals have already seen using standard statical methods?
You are welcome to your "opinion"... but that doesn't PROVE anything.Keep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron O
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ming View PostThat's still a far "shot" from saying MOSTTry http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ming View PostI think the stated margin for this study was + or - 4.6% to 4.9% (I don't remember what I read) This would be considered on the high side for research. But again... the research shows that republicans are either misinformed, or have silly beliefs. It does NOTHING to PROVE that they are racists/bigoted. You keep trying to make a relationship that is not supported by the research you use as proof.
You are welcome to your "opinion"... but that doesn't PROVE anything.Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.
Comment
Comment