Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

In France, Civil Unions Gain Favor Over Marriage.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • In France, Civil Unions Gain Favor Over Marriage.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/16/wo...er=rss&emc=rss

    PARIS — Some are divorced and disenchanted with marriage; others are young couples ideologically opposed to marriage, but eager to lighten their tax burdens. Many are lovers not quite ready for old-fashioned matrimony.
    Enlarge This Image
    William Daniels for The New York Times

    A pact is enough: Sophie Lazzaro and Thierry Galissant.
    Related

    Whatever their reasons, and they vary widely, French couples are increasingly shunning traditional marriages and opting instead for civil unions, to the point that there are now two civil unions for every three marriages.

    When France created its system of civil unions in 1999, it was heralded as a revolution in gay rights, a relationship almost like marriage, but not quite. No one, though, anticipated how many couples would make use of the new law. Nor was it predicted that by 2009, the overwhelming majority of civil unions would be between straight couples.

    It remains unclear whether the idea of a civil union, called a pacte civil de solidarité, or PACS, has responded to a shift in social attitudes or caused one. But it has proved remarkably well suited to France and its particularities about marriage, divorce, religion and taxes — and it can be dissolved with just a registered letter.

    “We’re the generation of divorced parents,” explained Maud Hugot, 32, an aide at the Health Ministry who signed a PACS with her girlfriend, Nathalie Mondot, 33, this year. Expressing a view that researchers say is becoming commonplace among same-sex couples and heterosexuals alike, she added, “The notion of eternal marriage has grown obsolete.”

    France recognizes only “citizens,” and the country’s legal principles hold that special rights should not be accorded to particular groups or ethnicities. So civil unions, which confer most of the tax benefits and legal protections of marriage, were made available to everyone. (Marriage, on the other hand, remains restricted to heterosexuals.) But the attractiveness of civil unions to heterosexual couples was evident from the start. In 2000, just one year after the passage of the law, more than 75 percent of civil unions were signed between heterosexual couples. That trend has only strengthened since then: of the 173,045 civil unions signed in 2009, 95 percent were between heterosexual couples.

    “It’s becoming more and more commonplace,” said Laura Anicet, 24, a student who signed a PACS last month with her 29-year-old boyfriend, Cyril Reich. “For me, before, the PACS was for homosexual couples.”

    As with traditional marriages, civil unions allow couples to file joint tax returns, exempt spouses from inheritance taxes, permit partners to share insurance policies, ease access to residency permits for foreigners and make partners responsible for each other’s debts. Concluding a civil union requires little more than a single appearance before a judicial official, and ending one is even easier.

    It long ago became common here to speak of “getting PACSed” (se pacser, in French). More recently, wedding fairs have been renamed to include the PACS, department stores now offer PACS gift registries and travel agencies offer PACS honeymoon packages.

    Even the Roman Catholic Church, which initially condemned the partnerships as a threat to the institution of marriage, has relented; the National Confederation of Catholic Family Associations now says civil unions do not pose “a real threat.”

    While the partnerships have exploded in popularity, marriage numbers have continued a long decline in France, as across Europe. Just 250,000 French couples married in 2009, with fewer than four marriages per 1,000 residents; in 1970, almost 400,000 French couples wed.

    Germany, too, has seen a similar plunge in marriage rates. In 2009, there were just over four marriages per 1,000 residents compared with more than seven per 1,000 in 1970. In the United States, the current rate is 6.8 per 1,000 residents, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

    France is not the only European nation to allow civil unions between straight couples, but in the few countries that do — Luxembourg, Andorra, the Netherlands — they are not as popular. In the Netherlands in 2009, for example, there was just one civil union for every eight marriages.

    If current trends continue in France, new civil unions could soon outnumber marriages, as they already do in Paris’s youthful 11th Arrondissement.

    ...
    This is a good thing in my view, as long as they eventually phase out the classical notion of marriage in state affairs, something that for example the far left feminist party has commendably already proposed in Sweden.

    Also they need to remove the two person limit.
    Modern man calls walking more quickly in the same direction down the same road “change.”
    The world, in the last three hundred years, has not changed except in that sense.
    The simple suggestion of a true change scandalizes and terrifies modern man. -Nicolás Gómez Dávila

  • #2
    Important legal challenges in the UK went in to the European Court of Human Rights today. They are challenging so that gay people can have marriages and straight couples can have civil partnerships.

    Seems a no brainer to me.

    4 same sex couples have complained they can't be married, and four mixed sex couples have complained that they aren't allowed a civil partnership.
    Jon Miller: MikeH speaks the truth
    Jon Miller: MikeH is a shockingly revolting dolt and a masturbatory urine-reeking sideshow freak whose word is as valuable as an aging cow paddy.
    We've got both kinds

    Comment


    • #3
      Civil unions still discriminate against corporations, though. Corporations have to go through complicated and messy "mergers" if they want to be together, it's nearly impossible to break up a merger fairly once it ends, and the state is allowed to punish corporations that are too happy. It's sad, really.
      Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
      "We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld

      Comment


      • #4
        The CDC tracks marriages?
        Indifference is Bliss

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Heraclitus View Post
          Also they need to remove the two person limit.

          Comment


          • #6
            Ah, balls.

            A bid by eight couples to challenge the UK's ban on gay marriages and heterosexual civil partnerships has been stalled by paperwork, campaigners say.
            Jon Miller: MikeH speaks the truth
            Jon Miller: MikeH is a shockingly revolting dolt and a masturbatory urine-reeking sideshow freak whose word is as valuable as an aging cow paddy.
            We've got both kinds

            Comment


            • #7
              I see no reason to keep the 2 person limit either.
              Jon Miller: MikeH speaks the truth
              Jon Miller: MikeH is a shockingly revolting dolt and a masturbatory urine-reeking sideshow freak whose word is as valuable as an aging cow paddy.
              We've got both kinds

              Comment


              • #8
                It discriminates against single people.
                One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by MikeH View Post
                  I see no reason to keep the 2 person limit either.
                  Yeah, protection from bigamy (staying in two unions simultaneously) should stay a separate law, but there are still several problems.
                  1) People abusing it for fiscal reasons. You already get the same problem with arranged marriages. Yes, it can be a pain to prove you really are man and wife to the IRS if you don't share a household (ask Bruce Sterling). But you can't reasonably expect 10 people to have a single joint account and other assorted fiscal traits of a civil union. I'm sure that as soon as this is allowed, all eruvs will suddenly become civil unions.
                  2) Divorces. It's already hard to split the property between man and wife. Can one person leave a civil union without dissolving it? How much of its property is he entitled to?
                  Graffiti in a public toilet
                  Do not require skill or wit
                  Among the **** we all are poets
                  Among the poets we are ****.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X