More evidence for agument in favor of institutionalizing right-wing loonies.

[Al B. Sure!]

Can you even read, you ****ing moron?

HEY GENIUS...

ONE, I DIDN'T READ THE ******'S WHOLE ARTICLE.

TWO, he says:

My point in all this is that we appear to have reached a point in awarding the MOH that we are squeamish about awarding to those who "take the hill" as well as awarding to those who throw themselves on a grenade to save their comrades.

He says we're squeamish about awarding to those who throw themselves on a grenade... it doesn't seem like squeamish when 3 recent Medal of Honor recipients received it for just that exact thing.

****ING LEARN TO READ KH.

[KrazyHorse]

No, you ****ing moron. He says that the US has become squeamish about awarding medals for killing foreigners while remaining non-squeamish about the grenade-falling. If you could read you would have understood that.

[KrazyHorse]

The ENTIRE ARTICLE consisted of him contrasting the two types of heroism he sees, one of which is "taking the hill" and one of which is "falling on the grenade".

This is ****ing pathetic, albie. You're reaching new lows.

[Al B. Sure!]

HOW THE ****!?

My point in all this is that we appear to have reached a point in awarding the MOH that we are squeamish about awarding to those who "take the hill" as well as [BEING SQUEAMISH ABOUT] awarding to those who throw themselves on a grenade to save their comrades.

The dude is a retarded and said it wrong. Sue me.

[Argus]

Did you ever need evidence in the first place to put away right-wing nutjobs? They are as dangerous to America as terrorists are, yet they have the gall to tell us we are un-American. Unbelievable.

[Al B. Sure!]

The ENTIRE ARTICLE consisted of him contrasting the two types of heroism he sees, one of which is "taking the hill" and one of which is "falling on the grenade".

This is ****ing pathetic, albie. You're reaching new lows.

Fine. You're right. I didn't read the article. I was wrong.

I'll be one step higher than you and actually admit when I'm wrong.

[Argus]

I'll be one step higher than you and actually admit when I'm wrong.

This sounds like a decent forum.

[Al B. Sure!]

This sounds like a decent forum.

[Egbert]

This sounds like a decent forum.

The people here are decent (apart from maybe two). I gues Albie is laughing because we can be like a pack of hyenas sometimes. Flame wars break out out sporadically and there are several regular posters who obviously don't like one another.

Welcome to the forum.

[Argus]

Thanks. I think this will be nice. I'm a little disappointed at the activity level in the civ forums though. Civfanatics is much busier there, but Civfanatics has its problems too.

[KrazyHorse]

Fine. You're right. I didn't read the article. I was wrong.

I'll be one step higher than you and actually admit when I'm wrong.

I admit freely when I'm wrong. It happens many, many times a day.

[KrazyHorse]

The people here are decent (apart from maybe two). I gues Albie is laughing because we can be like a pack of hyenas sometimes. Flame wars break out out sporadically and there are several regular posters who obviously don't like one another.

Welcome to the forum.

What's this "we" nonsense, you 480 post *****?

Welcome to the forum, Argus. 191 to go...

[Argus]

191 to go until what?

[KrazyHorse]

189 now...

http://apolyton.net/showthread.php/191660-I-have-resolved-to-be-nicer-to-new-posters?daysprune=365

[Argus]

Am I supposed to be worried?