Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Hey girls, like to date *******s? Don’t worry, you’re not alone

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Hey girls, like to date *******s? Don’t worry, you’re not alone



    Curiously familiar hypothetical situation: You’re at a bar with your friends when you spot a guy you recently hooked up with. You’re feeling indifferent about him, but you wouldn’t be opposed to giving it another go. You think, “Ehh, no need to say ‘Hi’ right away.” Twenty minutes later, he still hasn’t approached you. You wonder, “Why hasn’t he said anything to me? Does my hair look bad?” But granted you’re not criminally insane, you brush it off and look for someone else to schmooze. Thirty minutes later, still nothing. Well, he did wink at you from across the bar (or was there just something stuck in his eye?), but then he started talking to some girl wearing a tube dress. Your confusion escalates. “Oh god, she’s way hotter than me. I knew I should’ve worn heels.” Suddenly, your neurosis reaches “Girl, Interrupted” levels and you wonder how you got so nuts. To avoid further humiliation, you turn to a friend and ask if she wants to leave and get nachos.

    On a scale of 1-10, how pathetic does this sound? If you’re thinking 25, don’t worry, you’re not even remotely off base. But as desperate as it seems, I won’t hesitate for a moment to say we’ve all been there.

    Fact: Girls love guys who are, for lack of a better description, total *******s.

    We’ve seen it time and time (and time?) again, but nonetheless, it’s an issue that riddles our minds with confusion, stress and a ****ton of excitement. So, what’s a girl to do about this bleak reality? I’m not exactly sure, but after years of qualitative research, I’ve theorized a few of the many reasons we go after those guys we love to hate.

    Don’t hate the player?

    The excitement of a night out in college lies partially in what experts refer to as SPQ (spontaneous potential quotient). By experts, I clearly mean myself as of two minutes ago, but I’m definitely on to something here — we college students love uncertainty, and we love it the most when it comes as an accessory to vodka and random new people.

    Most girls are turned off by a guy who showers her with attention. It bores us, it seems desperate and it can be a predictor for a slew of undesirable behaviors lurking beneath the surface. Instead, we gravitate toward guys who give us just enough attention to keep us on our toes. Here’s what I mean:

    Socially-unaware-nice-guy: Hi Rachel! I saw you from across the bar. You look pretty. Can I buy you a drink? You look like a G&T gal. So, what are your career aspirations? I love kids. You look pretty.

    *******: Hey.

    Think about it. Have you ever seen a guy you’ve recently hooked up with and waited an hour for him to start flirting with you? And worse, did you feel great when he finally approached you and probably said a total of four syllables that somehow made you feel on top of the world? Don’t be embarrassed if that’s a yes. We’re aroused by the unpredictability of waiting for a guy to strike up a conversation with us, and the longer it takes, the more rewarded we feel when it actually happens. Sure, some girls have no problem continuously initiating contact, but most of us would rather be the approachees in those delicate initial stages.

    Disclaimer: The whole delayed-gratification thing only works to a certain extent. Minor teasing is tolerable and undeniably fun at times, but most self-respecting girls won’t chase after a guy who’s outright ignoring them.

    The Worthy Competitor

    You know what? It’s a cop-out to say only weak girls go for *******s. Self-esteem aside, many girls crave the thrill of keeping up with a jerky guy, or better yet, putting him in his place. While they might not always be better at flirting per se, *******s have a certain knack for conversation that confident girls can’t wait to provoke. When you’re not looking for anything serious, few things are sexier than a well-spoken, quick-talking guy whose comebacks somehow indicate that he’ll be amazing in bed.

    The Tucker Max-querade

    Whether you’ve read his books, stalked his website, or simply thought to yourself, “I know a guy just like this!” there’s one thing you can’t deny: Tucker Max is really, really epic.

    Entertaining as his drunken tales are, Mr. Max has spawned a new breed of wannabe *******s who masquerade as genuinely awesome guys by mimicking traits like confidence, charm and humor in the forms of aggression, sleaze and flirtatious insults. It’s difficult for our drunken brains to distinguish between worthwhile guys and those who embody that second set of qualities — and for most casual flings, we don’t care to evaluate the difference. In fact, getting attention from an identified ******* can seem weirdly special.

    Example: If a guy won’t give other people the time of day, but he’s taking a moment of his time to be semi-decent toward you, you might think to yourself “Wow, this guy’s being nice to me. He’s usually such a douche! I must be different.” False.

    In the end, there’s no clear way to stay away from guys who play these games. It seems the best we can do is hold our heads high, stay on our toes and sleep with one eye open.
    http://badgerherald.com/artsetc/2010...like_to_da.php

    Love the title she choose (OP title). In other news, bears do indeed sh*t in woods.
    Last edited by Heraclitus; September 25, 2010, 13:29. Reason: Added the link
    Modern man calls walking more quickly in the same direction down the same road “change.”
    The world, in the last three hundred years, has not changed except in that sense.
    The simple suggestion of a true change scandalizes and terrifies modern man. -Nicolás Gómez Dávila

  • #2
    Yes, we get it. You're a loser.
    “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
    "Capitalism ho!"

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Heraclitus View Post




      In other news, bears do indeed sh*t in woods.

      Hmm, yes, quite.
      ___________
      /



      look, I feel bad for the fact that you are a loser that cannot get laid. I think the reason is that your personality is ****. Perhaps it is better if you kill yourself.


      EDIT: It is possible that you are ugly. If this is the case, work out, clean up, and scrape whatever pathetic salary you get to buy some nice clothes to cover for that fact. Use whatever female contact you have to shop with ( your mom and aunties do not count). If not, use a professional.


      Cheers
      urgh.NSFW

      Comment


      • #4
        I have no problem getting laid. I however have been called a misogynist and bastard on this very forum when I tried to give Alby advice.


        However even if I couldn't get laid, this wouldn't affect the veracity of the title she choose. The majority of young attractive girls like confident and charming jerks, why cater to a smaller market?
        Modern man calls walking more quickly in the same direction down the same road “change.”
        The world, in the last three hundred years, has not changed except in that sense.
        The simple suggestion of a true change scandalizes and terrifies modern man. -Nicolás Gómez Dávila

        Comment


        • #5
          Hey, awesome, whatever, man. Just the dumb PUA "fake it till you make it" **** is bollocks. BE A BETTER PERSON.

          it is possible.
          urgh.NSFW

          Comment


          • #6
            Hey, awesome, whatever, man. Just the dumb PUA "fake it till you make it" **** is bollocks. BE A BETTER PERSON.

            it is possible.
            urgh.NSFW

            Comment


            • #7
              You can't really be a fake a**hole. You either are one or aren't.
              Modern man calls walking more quickly in the same direction down the same road “change.”
              The world, in the last three hundred years, has not changed except in that sense.
              The simple suggestion of a true change scandalizes and terrifies modern man. -Nicolás Gómez Dávila

              Comment


              • #8
                @ yet another pathetic hera post

                Comment


                • #9
                  Is there any point in noting that men's preferences as to women vary widely, and therefore the other way around is likely true as well? If not, eh, I said it anyway.

                  EDIT: Also, after reading the quoted bit, it seems its author is a drunken sperm-bucket writing for an audience of other drunken sperm-buckets. And it's not even a statistical sampling of drunken sperm-buckets, it's purely anecdotal and from a woman who doesn't look like she'd be exactly pick of the drunken sperm-bucket litter anyway.
                  Last edited by Elok; September 25, 2010, 17:59.
                  1011 1100
                  Pyrebound--a free online serial fantasy novel

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Elok View Post
                    Is there any point in noting that men's preferences as to women vary widely, and therefore the other way around is likely true as well? If not, eh, I said it anyway.

                    EDIT: Also, after reading the quoted bit, it seems its author is a drunken sperm-bucket writing for an audience of other drunken sperm-buckets. And it's not even a statistical sampling of drunken sperm-buckets, it's purely anecdotal and from a woman who doesn't look like she'd be exactly pick of the drunken sperm-bucket litter anyway.
                    Her last name is even Dickens
                    "Flutie was better than Kelly, Elway, Esiason and Cunningham." - Ben Kenobi
                    "I have nothing against Wilson, but he's nowhere near the same calibre of QB as Flutie. Flutie threw for 5k+ yards in the CFL." -Ben Kenobi

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I'm curious why the picture? You generally don't see large pictures next to people's articles and then Hera posted it in the thread for some reason.
                      "Flutie was better than Kelly, Elway, Esiason and Cunningham." - Ben Kenobi
                      "I have nothing against Wilson, but he's nowhere near the same calibre of QB as Flutie. Flutie threw for 5k+ yards in the CFL." -Ben Kenobi

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        He's being nice and showing you the type of woman you'd be going home with if you adopted those techniques
                        “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
                        - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Imran: the type of woman you'd be going back home without those techniques... is also the kind of woman you'd be getting back home with those techniques.
                          In Soviet Russia, Fake borises YOU.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui View Post
                            He's being nice and showing you the type of woman you'd be going home with if you adopted those techniques
                            All I wanted to show that was that the author was perfectly average looking with a girl next door vibe. No skanky fake Californid blonde or a delicious dark haired but insane seductress (not that there is anything wrong with that).

                            Originally posted by Oncle Boris View Post
                            Imran: the type of woman you'd be going back home without those techniques... is also the kind of woman you'd be getting back home with those techniques.
                            +1
                            Modern man calls walking more quickly in the same direction down the same road “change.”
                            The world, in the last three hundred years, has not changed except in that sense.
                            The simple suggestion of a true change scandalizes and terrifies modern man. -Nicolás Gómez Dávila

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Kuciwalker View Post
                              @ yet another pathetic hera post
                              Admit it you missed them like a chronic knee ache.
                              Modern man calls walking more quickly in the same direction down the same road “change.”
                              The world, in the last three hundred years, has not changed except in that sense.
                              The simple suggestion of a true change scandalizes and terrifies modern man. -Nicolás Gómez Dávila

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X