The GMAT is hella' easy. It's all high school math and problem solving.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Scenario!!!
Collapse
X
-
Oh, and it's pretty ballsy of you to call me a liar in my own thread. A little too ballsy, if you know what I mean.“As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
"Capitalism ho!"
Comment
-
Originally posted by DaShi View PostThe GMAT is hella' easy. It's all high school math and problem solving.
Also, what's the deal with the analysis of the issue and analysis of an argument? That's not part of the main score; any idea on how college admissions look at those sections?"Flutie was better than Kelly, Elway, Esiason and Cunningham." - Ben Kenobi
"I have nothing against Wilson, but he's nowhere near the same calibre of QB as Flutie. Flutie threw for 5k+ yards in the CFL." -Ben Kenobi
Comment
-
During the actual exam they have a dwarf tap dancing in front of you. That ups the difficulty considerably.“As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
"Capitalism ho!"
Comment
-
Should have done this earlier:
"Chickity-choco, the chocolate chicken
The rear cockdiesel but chicks they were kicking""Flutie was better than Kelly, Elway, Esiason and Cunningham." - Ben Kenobi
"I have nothing against Wilson, but he's nowhere near the same calibre of QB as Flutie. Flutie threw for 5k+ yards in the CFL." -Ben Kenobi
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jon Miller View PostI have heard that there are good business opportunities but they require a lot of interfacing with the chinese.
JMJon Miller: MikeH speaks the truth
Jon Miller: MikeH is a shockingly revolting dolt and a masturbatory urine-reeking sideshow freak whose word is as valuable as an aging cow paddy.
We've got both kinds
Comment
-
Originally posted by Al B. Sure! View PostOkay you're a liar then I see. A shame. I wanted to ask you some questions about the GMAT.
I took it about 10 years ago and I found it really easy. The only thing I found a little different was it was a computer based adaptive test (questions get harder or easier as you go along depending on how you do). So unlike "paper" tests there was no skipping questions that might take you a little longer. The nature of an adaptive test is that early questions count for more so its worth it to spend some extra time double-checking before answering on the early questions.
Overall I found it easier than the LSAT but I did spend an extra few minutes memorizing little formulas like the areas and volumes of cubes, spheres, cones etc.
Other than that I did the standard practice test that came with the materials when I registered and nothing elseYou don't get to 300 losses without being a pretty exceptional goaltender.-- Ben Kenobi speaking of Roberto Luongo
Comment
-
Actually I finally got around to sitting down with a pen and paper and doing the Math Problem Solving (before that, I had only done reading comprehension, sentence correction, critical reasoning, and data sufficiency, the things that you obviously don't really need scratch paper for) and I did badly. It said I was in the average range. This is not good. I had relearned all the little random math stuff like how the sides of a 30-60-90 triangle are in the ratio 1:3^1/2:2 and that combinations can be solved by n!/(k!(n-k)!) and random stuff like that... but man, when I was trying to solve the problems, I felt in over my head.
I really don't even know how to do math problems anymore I guess this is the type of thing where it's not a matter of learning the math concepts but learning how and when to apply them... There were questions like which is closest to the product of all the prime numbers less than 20 with 10^6 10^7 10^8 10^9 10^10 And I was looking at it like what the ****? Am I supposed to solve 2*3*5*7*11*13*17*19???
I realize now that it's simple and it goes up from 2*3*5 is 30, *7 is 210, and it adds an additional digit each time but I wasn't imagining anything like that when I was trying to solve it.Last edited by Al B. Sure!; August 4, 2010, 20:35."Flutie was better than Kelly, Elway, Esiason and Cunningham." - Ben Kenobi
"I have nothing against Wilson, but he's nowhere near the same calibre of QB as Flutie. Flutie threw for 5k+ yards in the CFL." -Ben Kenobi
Comment
Comment