Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Crack-Powder Disparity Narrowed

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Crack-Powder Disparity Narrowed

    House votes to eliminate cocaine sentencing disparity

    By WILLIAM DOUGLAS
    McClatchy Newspapers

    WASHINGTON -- The House of Representatives passed a historic bill Wednesday that narrows sentencing disparities between crack and powder cocaine convictions, which civil rights and civil liberties experts say contributed to the disproportionate imprisonment of African-Americans in recent decades.

    The Senate passed its version of the bill in March. President Barack Obama, who during the 2008 presidential campaign said the current legal disparity "cannot be justified and should be eliminated," is expected to sign the legislation.

    By voice vote, the House altered a law implemented in 1986 during the early phase of the crack cocaine epidemic. It required anyone convicted of possession of 5 grams of crack to be sentenced to at least five years in prison.

    Many lawmakers and organizations such as the NAACP and the American Civil Liberties Union complained for nearly a quarter-century that the law was unfair because someone convicted of crack possession got the same mandatory sentence as someone convicted of possessing 100 times that amount of powder cocaine, a drug more popular among whites.

    A 2009 report by the Sentencing Project, a liberal advocacy group, found that drug use rates were similar among racial and ethnic groups, but that sentencing among the groups for cocaine violations was vastly different, in large part because of the disparity between sentences for crack and powder cocaine.

    In 2006, 81.8 percent of crack cocaine defendants were black, 8.8 percent were white and 8.4 percent were Hispanic, according the Sentencing Project report. For the same year, 57.5 percent of powder cocaine defendants were Hispanic, 27 percent were African-American and 14.7 were percent white.

    "African American drug defendants have a 20 percent greater chance of being sentenced to prison than white drug defendants," the Sentencing Project report said. "Between 1994 and 2003, the average time served by African Americans for drug offenses increased by 62 percent, compared to an increase of 17 percent for white drug offenders."

    The House bill raises the five-year mandatory minimum sentencing trigger for crack possession from five grams to 28 grams and eliminates mandatory minimum sentencing for simple possession of crack. Possession of 500 grams of powder cocaine carries a mandatory minimum five years in prison under the bill.

    "In passing the Fair Sentencing Act today, the House sent a bill to President Obama that is a step forward in addressing the fairness of our sentencing laws," said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif. "This legislation reduces the disparity between sentences for crack and powder cocaine - a step long overdue."

    Civil rights groups applauded the House vote and urged Obama to sign the bill quickly.

    "Because of the mandatory minimum jail sentence for those convicted of possession of 5 grams of crack cocaine or more, people of color are being put in prisons at much higher rates than their Caucasian counterparts, and the judges have no discretion to mitigate the sentence for first-time or nonviolent offenders or special circumstances," NAACP President Benjamin Jealous said. "This legislation is just the first step in eliminating disparities in sentencing, and we will continue to push for the elimination of this racially discriminatory sentencing disparity."

    Read more: http://www.miamiherald.com/2010/07/2...#ixzz0v2Lf452x
    From 100 to 1, to 18 to 1. A very good step in the right direction and long overdue.
    Captain of Team Apolyton - ISDG 2012

    When I was younger I thought curfews were silly, but now as the daughter of a young woman, I appreciate them. - Rah

  • #2
    I think the high crime rate and conviction rate among black people is a problem that runs a bit deeper than the disparity in the criminalization of illegal drugs.

    I would bet that the common denominator among virtually all the defendants regardless of race is poverty. On that topic, the policies that have been in place for decades aiming to reduce black poverty in my opinion appear to have failed. I think we need to try a new approach. For instance, affirmative action should start in elementary school in my opinion.
    If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
    ){ :|:& };:

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View Post
      I think the high crime rate and conviction rate among black people is a problem that runs a bit deeper than the disparity in the criminalization of illegal drugs.
      Deeper yes. But criminalization of drugs is certainly a contributing factor. A strikingly high number of the poor grow up without a father. Where are their fathers? A good number are in jail for a drug offense. A father figure (and a second income) would certainly help matters.
      Captain of Team Apolyton - ISDG 2012

      When I was younger I thought curfews were silly, but now as the daughter of a young woman, I appreciate them. - Rah

      Comment


      • #4
        Crack use tends to argue against a father figure and a second income.
        I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
        For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

        Comment


        • #5
          I was going to make a similar comment

          Why do they use crack in first place?

          And, why crack and not cocaine? In Argentina Crack has became an important drug only in the last 5 years, and the people who smoke that drug are the poorest of the poor, homeless or lumpen proletarian shanty town people.

          In the USA the poor should be able to afford better drugs, crack is almost poison
          I need a foot massage

          Comment


          • #6
            The issue I have is this: yes, the law is probably a bit racist. I just have trouble opposing , because crack users are more likely to have violent criminal records than coke users.
            Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/DaveDaDouche
            Read my seldom updated blog where I talk to myself: http://davedadouche.blogspot.com/

            Comment


            • #7
              every crack user i have ever known was a violent, chaotic, unpredictable, and dangerous human being... and i have known a lot of them as i literally lived in 2 well known neighborhood crack houses for over 7 years.

              people that i knew that did powder were far moar relaxed (in comparison), able to hold a 10 minute conversation without a surge of emotion, were usually financially better off, and didn't want to beat people with lead pipes and take their wallets for their next "fix" like the former. If they were dealers they would even lace other drugs with it to make their product better for the same price.

              So this bill is terrible, IMO.
              Order of the Fly
              Those that cannot curse, cannot heal.

              Comment

              Working...
              X