Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Brutalism - yay or nay?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    It is just so amazing how an architectural style so damn hideous spread so far around the globe and ruined so many damn buildings in such a short period of time.
    Captain of Team Apolyton - ISDG 2012

    When I was younger I thought curfews were silly, but now as the daughter of a young woman, I appreciate them. - Rah

    Comment


    • #47
      I'd donate money towards demolishing these three (the rest can pass):





      Comment


      • #48
        From my home city. I don't know whether this counts as brutalism, but
        it's made from concrete and it's downright ugly:

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by Cort Haus View Post
          San Diego's Qualcomm stadium - hard on the eyes imo

          Yeah, it's pretty hard on the eyes. It was designed in the early 60's and built in the mid 60's in a neo-brutalist style. Lots of people want to see it blown up.

          Originally posted by SlowwHand View Post
          The Geisel Library though I do like. Students at UCSD call it the mother ship because it looks like a flying saucer landing.
          Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

          Comment


          • #50
            The Salk Institute for Biological Studies (named after Jonas Salk who invented the cure for Polio and founded the institute) is another neo-brutalist piece designed and built in the early 60's.





            Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

            Comment


            • #51
              I like our National Library's building

              My grandparents' (former) house was also a brutalist piece, and I loved it
              Indifference is Bliss

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by OzzyKP View Post
                It is just so amazing how an architectural style so damn hideous spread so far around the globe and ruined so many damn buildings in such a short period of time.
                It was cheap to build and so it became popular. Not popular with the people who had to look at them or work in them or, heaven forbid, live in one but cheap was very popular with developers.
                Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                Comment


                • #53
                  Neo-brutalist, Oerdin? That sounds like the architects gave up on it in 1961 and suddenly got re-enthused in 1962.

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    I've become a fan of the Geisel Library thanks to this thread

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      What I don't like is all the naked concrete of brutalism. I know that was the big attraction because it was dirt cheap and you didn't even have to paint it but it looks so monstrously ugly and most of the time there isn't even a green growing thing in sight.
                      Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by Cort Haus View Post
                        Neo-brutalist, Oerdin? That sounds like the architects gave up on it in 1961 and suddenly got re-enthused in 1962.
                        Well, I guess it is brutalist in that it is naked concrete but the design themes seem different from the more iconic and well known brutalist buildings so I've heard it called neo-brutalist but maybe its just a subgroup of brutalism. I honestly don't know how architects classify it.
                        Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Originally posted by Cort Haus View Post
                          Mairie d'Ivry district in Paris, and it's mental. Almost medieval with its overhangs and gables



                          This I kind of like. Yes, it's still that ugly concrete but the designers at least got creative with shapes and found ways to incorporate some green bushes and trees.
                          Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Nay.
                            "I hope I get to punch you in the face one day" - MRT144, Imran Siddiqui
                            'I'm fairly certain that a ban on me punching you in the face is not a "right" worth respecting." - loinburger

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Originally posted by VetLegion View Post
                              From my home city. I don't know whether this counts as brutalism, but
                              it's made from concrete and it's downright ugly:

                              ****ing hell, that's grim.

                              I think it's fair to say that it is brutalist. Rough concrete. Geometric. Striking. Angular. I checked, and it's definitely not Constructivist, International Style, Expressionist, Postmodern or Deconstructionist. It also has the dirty, gloomy emotive negative connotations often associated with a style that was originally a post-war budget saver.

                              Can Barnabus defend it, that's the question?

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                And with A/C units sticking out.
                                Indifference is Bliss

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X