I follow a fitness/health philosophy called Crossfit and Crossfitters usually praise fish oil and Vitamin D supplementation to levels I've never seen recommended before (fish oil: 3-5 GRAMS/day; Vitamin D: 5,000 IU/day; compare: the USDA recommends 200 IU/day of Vitamin D).
Now most of the evidence is anecdotal or references Soviet Bloc-era athletes and more legitimate studies, of which there are not many, seem to indicate that the 200 IU recommended by the USDA is far too low and 1000 IU may be more appropriate, although there is not much literature on this topic, especially not with regards to the benefits to physically active people.
Most of the research seems to originate from the Vitamin D Council which has an obvious bias.
My question is two-fold: one, is it likely that supplementation to such levels may provide health benefits, especially in the context of athletes, and two, perhaps more importantly, is the body even capable of absorbing such high daily levels of Vitamin D or is such supplementation mostly wasted?
Now most of the evidence is anecdotal or references Soviet Bloc-era athletes and more legitimate studies, of which there are not many, seem to indicate that the 200 IU recommended by the USDA is far too low and 1000 IU may be more appropriate, although there is not much literature on this topic, especially not with regards to the benefits to physically active people.
Most of the research seems to originate from the Vitamin D Council which has an obvious bias.
My question is two-fold: one, is it likely that supplementation to such levels may provide health benefits, especially in the context of athletes, and two, perhaps more importantly, is the body even capable of absorbing such high daily levels of Vitamin D or is such supplementation mostly wasted?
Comment