What Is The Biological Purpose For Early Morning Erections?

[Ghaladh]

Damned gays... since they take over the word "gay", I cannot be "gay" any longer. If I awake in a good mood I must be "happy", but that's not just as I feel... being "gay" is a more light-minded stance but I have to be f***ing happy, although I'm not, otherwise my partner will start worrying about my sexual preferences. :-D

Me: "you know, darling, today I feel very gay".
She: "It doesn't matter. Are you up for some shopping, then?"
Me: "what the hell are you talking about?"
She: "well, I thought we were going to remain good friends, at least"
Me: "Screw you, b**ch"

lol

[Asher]

Too many breeders on this site already. It's disgusting.

[Ghaladh]

"breeders"?

[Asher]

You heard me.

[gwillybj]

good mood, but not necessarily happy... how about aroused? or is it too much of a Webster's word?

[DaShi]

Asher is right to distrust straight people.

Fact: All of the terrorists involved in 9/11 were straight!

[Ghaladh]

You heard me.

I mean...

1) "breeders" as heterosexuals committed in long-lasting relationships destined to procreation.

2) "breeders" as members of a heterosexual couple that procreate like animals, without a logical reason or just because they are too ignorant or narrow-minded to consider the use of condoms. (see also - monotheistic fondamentalism)

3) "breeders" as members of a country community, where usually you can find very large families. (some times the parents are relatives to each other - cousins, step-brothers, uncle and nephew...)

4) "breeders" as a someone that breeds animals. (Hell, I live in Switzerland, but I don't possess a cow!) :-D

I belong to the first category of "breeders".

[Ghaladh]

Asher is right to distrust straight people.

Fact: All of the terrorists involved in 9/11 were straight!

I've read many times that Hitler was homosexual. I don't know if this is heterosexual propaganda against gay people or if it's a poor attempt to found a Nazi-gay party, though...

[Asher]

I mean...

1) "breeders" as heterosexuals committed in long-lasting relationships destined to procreation.

2) "breeders" as members of a heterosexual couple that procreate like animals, without a logical reason or just because they are too ignorant or narrow-minded to consider the use of condoms. (see also - monotheistic fondamentalism)

3) "breeders" as members of a country community, where usually you can find very large families. (some times the parents are relatives to each other - cousins, step-brothers, uncle and nephew...)

4) "breeders" as a someone that breeds animals. (Hell, I live in Switzerland, but I don't possess a cow!) :-D

I belong to the first category of "breeders".

You are so selfish.

The world is overpopulated as it is. Stop creating more!

Seriously, how rude is that!

[Ghaladh]

good mood, but not necessarily happy... how about aroused? or is it too much of a Webster's word?

"aroused", as many of the English words, has more than one significance; might also mean that I am quite horny because my sexual appetite has been whet. Of course the morning wood would give more credit to this latter meaning. But I have to brush my teeth before starting something :-D. I want the right to be "gay" without implying that I want to have sex with another man!

Why homosexuals do not define themselves with an uncommon word like "amorevolous" and leave to the mankind the freedom to use the "gay" word without sexual implications?

[Ghaladh]

You are so selfish.

The world is overpopulated as it is. Stop creating more!

Seriously, how rude is that!

I hope to procreate a very active serial-killer, that would solve the problem. That's why I want offspring . I am very generous.

[Asher]

Well, as long as your intentions are pure.

[MikeH]

Hitler was also a Catholic. I expect Ben could explain why he doesn't need to be excommunicated but people who save womens lives should.

[Ghaladh]

Hitler was also a Catholic. I expect Ben could explain why he doesn't need to be excommunicated but people who save womens lives should.

He cannot be excommunicated because he didn't belonged to the Christian church anymore. If the Vatican would excommunicate him, it would be like admitting that he was still accepted amongst the Christians when he ruled Germany. Hitler might also have defined himself as a Christian, but he simply wasn't.

P.S.: I am Pagan, so I am not defending the church. ;-)

[ricketyclik]

No :-). "Partner" is the most correct definition for the woman that lives with me. We are not married, so I cannot call her "wife", but the relationship is very serious and we live together, so I cannot call her "girlfriend" (and moreover she is no more a "girl", at 30 :-D).

Don't you have "common law" marriages in your country? I.e. living together in a marriage-like state = marriage.