Announcement

**The Mad Monk** · October 9, 2009, 01:13

Sometimes, the cover of a song is much better than the original.

**SlowwHand** · October 9, 2009, 01:32

You can't say that. It's a matter of preference. I understand your intent, but you just can't say that.

**Lord Avalon** · October 9, 2009, 02:36

No one said 4000

?

**KrazyHorse** · October 9, 2009, 09:02

Originally posted by Kuciwalker View Post

In that case, the value is extrinsic: it comes from enjoying the horror of other people.

I'd do it even if I couldn't tell anybody else about it.

**MikeH** · October 9, 2009, 09:09

I thought this thread was a clever troll for KrazyHorse based around misdefining intrinsic.

Either the troll failed, or I was wrong.

**loinburger** · October 9, 2009, 10:14

It was a heavyhanded troll aimed at artfag types, but it didn't work very well at all

**JEELEN** · October 9, 2009, 22:23

Originally posted by KrazyHorse View Post

Really? I'm pretty sure that you'd pay at least 100$ for the privilege of burning the original Mona Lisa. I know I would.

Depending on where you live $100 may get you near the Mona Lisa, but it'd cost a lot more to steal it - and you'd better not get caught...

**Solomwi** · October 9, 2009, 23:39

Originally posted by JEELEN View Post

Depending on where you live $100 may get you near the Mona Lisa, but it'd cost a lot more to steal it - and you'd better not get caught...

Which has nothing to do with how much he or loin would be willing to pay to burn it. That's an entirely one-sided question.

How much intrinsic value does an original piece of art have over a copy?