Teabaggers protest DC Metro

[MOBIUS]

Metro service "not up to snuff" for Saturday protests.



You can't make this **** up folks.

(By the way, Brady opposed the stimulus package that included money for Metro to finish a backlog of maintenance and run a new line to the Dulles airport, where those protestors no doubt flew into.)

Aren't Republicans, by definition, against public transport?

I'm sure DC Metro was fully prepared for them if they'd all laid on the tracks.

[MOBIUS]

Obama: Half-Breed Muslin cracks my ass up.

Half Muslin, half Gingham?

[DaShi]

Zaku is so a DL.

[Felch]

And, for the record, Poly is considerably more conservative than you think. They just aren't insane reactionaries like yourself. You know, to Genghis Khan, Adolf Hitler was a liberal.

I'm not sure about Mr. Khan's political beliefs (aside from his support for rape and pillage), but you're wrong to call Hitler liberal. He was a socialist.

[chequita guevara]

I guess he was also a worker.

[zakubandit]

So as per what Che says that when a leftist says yes big government and is called an idiot it is ok because that leftist believes that the right winger calling for no big government is the real idiot.

...

Your logic is flawed, yet close to right, but yet still makes you sound like an incredible dip ****. I say you a ****ed in the head shut in, I feel my opinion is right. You say I am a lunatic not worth the dribble coming out of my mouth, you feel your opinion is right. We both feel each others opinions are dirt....so what does it boil down to? I think something along the line of who has more friends (ie: who has more people).

[Felch]

so what does it boil down to? I think something along the line of who has more friends (ie: who has more people).

Actually it's an easy problem to solve. Take your pride and personal biases out of the equation, and rationally examine all of the evidence. Democracy will only tell you what is common knowledge. Common knowledge is full of nonsense myths, like saying that we only use ten percent of our brain, or that we eat 7 spiders every month, or that the President of the United States was born in Kenya. Just because common knowledge says something, doesn't make it true. Use your best abilities to impartially examine evidence and come to the best conclusion. Do that and people will start to pay attention to you.

[SlowwHand]

You know, to Genghis Khan, Adolf Hitler was a liberal.

I don't even know if it's tue or not, but the thought is funny as ****.

[DaShi]

So as per what Che says that when a leftist says yes big government and is called an idiot it is ok because that leftist believes that the right winger calling for no big government is the real idiot.

...

Your logic is flawed, yet close to right, but yet still makes you sound like an incredible dip ****. I say you a ****ed in the head shut in, I feel my opinion is right. You say I am a lunatic not worth the dribble coming out of my mouth, you feel your opinion is right. We both feel each others opinions are dirt....so what does it boil down to? I think something along the line of who has more friends (ie: who has more people).

If you think that then your opinion is wrong.

[zakubandit]

Actually it's an easy problem to solve. Take your pride and personal biases out of the equation, and rationally examine all of the evidence. Democracy will only tell you what is common knowledge. Common knowledge is full of nonsense myths, like saying that we only use ten percent of our brain, or that we eat 7 spiders every month, or that the President of the United States was born in Kenya. Just because common knowledge says something, doesn't make it true. Use your best abilities to impartially examine evidence and come to the best conclusion. Do that and people will start to pay attention to you.

So by what your saying it is ones personal judgment what to believe as rational and irrational. But at the same time you insinuate (by order of deduction) that if one does not believe rational to coincide with liberal then one is wrong. For example one believing Obama's health care reform ideas as irrational and fighting against it as rational, that that person is wrong by just the fact it is not rational to doubt Obama. Am I right? Or isn't it everything that is anti-Obama related seen as wrong by everyone here.

[zakubandit]

Oh and DaShi, if your still breathing air....your wrong.

[DaShi]

Did you not read my post about how oxygen was put into our atmosphere by the government?

[DaShi]

So by what your saying it is ones personal judgment what to believe as rational and irrational. But at the same time you insinuate (by order of deduction) that if one does not believe rational to coincide with liberal then one is wrong. For example one believing Obama's health care reform ideas as irrational and fighting against it as rational, that that person is wrong by just the fact it is not rational to doubt Obama. Am I right? Or isn't it everything that is anti-Obama related seen as wrong by everyone here.

It's not rational if you don't have a valid argument for backing it up. Just having a hate-on for Obama isn't an excuse. Except for Drake, because we love him.

[loinburger]

zaku is just a case of relativity run amok.

[zakubandit]

**** on me DaShi, you ****ers just dont get it. You all have a nice neat package of why to support Obama, and on the contrast there are nice neat package of why not to. **** me running cant you guys ever consider that the "teabaggers" don't care for his policies? Such as:

cap and trade
government run health care
no action to prevent illegal immigrants
action to legalize illegals
failure to ever act against illegals
letting Russia (Putin) push us our of missile defense in friendly Poland
no decision in Afghanistan DURING the war
not pushing Iran
not pushing Chavez
not pushing NPRK
pushing green on people who do not believe the hype of warming
pushing creative design into schools (sep of church and state anyone?)
no transparency of the WH
no transparency of government procedings
pushing more stimulus when the 1st isnt drained
higher unemployment rate than was *promised*
and of course the kicker which no matter how bad you wish it didn't exist will exist until proven not to have to....the transparent, honest, never lied a day in his life messiah of a president's personal records....making him the only president to ever keep records from the public....that right there is valid enough for me to support this.

You all may not think it matters that he is the only president in the history of America to not release his personal records (college transcripts, school transcripts, original complete birth documents, etc.) but to many many MANY people (including Federal Judge Carter of California...court date set Keyes vs Obama) that this does matter quite a bit.

So slander the oppostition as much as youd like. Boycott Fox news as much as youd like. But the fact of the matter remains you dumb ****s, no matter how much you try and close your eyes to the trees in the woods, they are all still there. There is reason to oppose Obie regardless of how much you try to say there isnt. Reality is reality, some people just see it differently and without a left curve to it.

**** is any of that clear enough? Or should I just say we all hate him beacuse he's black (quote this part cause I know you all love to read it as the main reason for opposition)